From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost@linux.hr>,
Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hongren Zheng <i@zenithal.me>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usbip: vhci: do not give back URBs with an unchecked actual_length
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:59:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eeaa6363-7892-40fa-9706-f484a1b84e4d@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auw5_lMRbGU97IKx@griffin.linux.hr>
On 11/5/26 01:10, Vlatko Kosturjak wrote:
> vhci_recv_ret_submit() copies actual_length from the RET_SUBMIT header
> into the URB, and only usbip_recv_xbuff() looks at it. That check is not
> enough:
>
> - an IN reply longer than transfer_buffer_length is rejected and the
> connection shut down, but the URB is still given back with the
> oversized actual_length (and status -EPROTO);
> - a negative actual_length (urb->actual_length is a u32) is not
> "> 0", so usbip_recv_xbuff() returns 0 without checking it and the
> URB is given back with status 0;
> - for OUT URBs usbip_recv_xbuff() returns 0 straight away, so any
> actual_length is given back.
>
> Completion handlers trust actual_length. usbfs copies that many bytes
> from the transfer buffer to user space in copy_urb_data_to_user(),
> whatever the URB status, so the kernel reads past the kmalloc()ed
> buffer. With CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY this is a BUG in the context of
> the process reaping the URB, here for a 22 byte reply to a 16 byte
> URB:
>
> usb 1-1: recv xbuf, 0
> usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'kmalloc-rnd-05-16' (offset 0, size 22)!
> kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!
> RIP: 0010:usercopy_abort+0x6c/0x80
> Call Trace:
> copy_urb_data_to_user+0x122/0x160
> processcompl+0xe3/0x160
> usbdev_do_ioctl+0x14d/0x1900
>
> Without it, the adjacent heap contents are copied to user space. A
> negative actual_length does the same on a URB that usbfs splits into
> scatterlist chunks: the last, shorter chunk is over-read by up to 16 KiB.
>
> This was hit with a buggy user-space USB/IP device implementation (it
> answered an IN URB with more data than requested) while pcscd read from
> the device; any server, buggy or malicious, can trigger it.
>
> Check actual_length against transfer_buffer_length right after
> unpacking the header, for IN and OUT URBs: the u32 comparison also
> catches negative values. On failure give the URB back with
> actual_length 0 and status -EPROTO and shut the connection down, as
> usbip_recv_xbuff() does, since any payload was not read. Also give the
> URB back with actual_length 0 when receiving the transfer buffer fails
> (a short read), as the buffer was not filled.
>
> Fixes: b348d7dddb6c ("USB: usbip: fix potential out-of-bounds write")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost@linux.hr>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Check actual_length before usbip_recv_xbuff() instead of only zeroing
> it when usbip_recv_xbuff() fails. v1 missed a negative actual_length
> (usbip_recv_xbuff() skips it, so the URB was given back with status 0)
> and OUT URBs (never checked). Pointed out by the Sashiko AI review.
> - Shut the connection down on that error, as usbip_recv_xbuff() does.
> - Tested on mainline 7.4-rc1 as well.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/aurLXADfuLjs-dm-@griffin.linux.hr/
>
> Tested in QEMU on mainline 7.4-rc1 (05441d697f7f, x86_64 defconfig +
> kvm_guest.config + USBIP_VHCI_HCD=m, HARDENED_USERCOPY=y) and on 7.0
> (Ubuntu 7.0.0-34-generic), with the same results on both. The reproducer
> is a user-space program that attaches a fake device to vhci_hcd through
> a Unix socketpair (no network or usbip tools needed), answers a bulk URB
> with a bad actual_length, and reaps the URB through usbfs:
>
> reply unpatched / v1 v2
> IN 16 bytes, length 22 BUG (v1: -EPROTO, length 0) -EPROTO, length 0
> IN 16 bytes, length -22 WARN in check_copy_size(), -EPROTO, length 0
> REAPURB fails with EFAULT
> IN 16400 bytes, length -22 BUG; with hardened_usercopy -EPROTO, length 0
> (two usbfs sg chunks) =off status 0 and 16 KiB
> of heap reach user space
> OUT 16 bytes, length 22 status 0, length 22 -EPROTO, length 0
>
> With hardened_usercopy=off the leaked heap bytes include kernel
> pointers. Legitimate replies are unaffected: device enumeration over the
> same connection works as before.
>
> Happy to send the reproducer (about 350 lines of C plus a QEMU script)
> if useful.
>
> The 2026 hardening of RET_SUBMIT (number_of_packets, iso frame lengths)
> does not cover this path; it is the non-isochronous actual_length.
>
> drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> index a678e7c898..3180dc3018 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_rx.c
> @@ -76,8 +76,27 @@ static void vhci_recv_ret_submit(struct vhci_device *vdev,
> /* unpack the pdu to a urb */
> usbip_pack_pdu(pdu, urb, USBIP_RET_SUBMIT, 0);
>
> + /*
> + * actual_length comes from the server, and completion handlers
> + * trust it: usbfs copies actual_length bytes out of transfer_buffer.
> + * Reject a negative one (it is a u32 in the URB) or one larger than
> + * the buffer, for IN and OUT URBs alike. Any payload was not read,
> + * so the stream is out of sync: drop the connection.
> + */
> + if (urb->actual_length > urb->transfer_buffer_length) {
> + dev_err(&urb->dev->dev, "ret_submit: actual_length %d exceeds buffer %u\n",
> + pdu->u.ret_submit.actual_length,
> + urb->transfer_buffer_length);
> + urb->actual_length = 0;
> + urb->status = -EPROTO;
> + usbip_event_add(ud, VDEV_EVENT_ERROR_TCP);
> + goto error;
> + }
I will take version of this patch with just the above change.
> +
> /* recv transfer buffer */
> if (usbip_recv_xbuff(ud, urb) < 0) {
> + /* short read: the buffer was not filled */
> + urb->actual_length = 0;
> urb->status = -EPROTO;
> goto error;
> }
This fix will go in a different patch.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/179328314074.648427.388274461758949120@gmail.com
thanks,
-- Shuah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 8:10 Vlatko Kosturjak
2026-11-11 15:59 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eeaa6363-7892-40fa-9706-f484a1b84e4d@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=i@zenithal.me \
--cc=kost@linux.hr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®