From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allow GIC ITS number more than MAX_NUMNODES
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:11:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eec017c3-0d41-fb9f-478c-805368f66179@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725104758.GC19302@red-moon>
On 2017/7/25 18:47, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:54:12AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>
>> When running 4.13-rc1 on top of D05, I got the boot log:
>
> Nit: You should stick to what the problem is and why you need to solve
> it, "Fixes:" tag gives the commit history you need, the rest (eg "When
> running 4.13-rc1") does not belong in the commit log.
Updated as "After enabling the ITS NUMA support on D05, I got
the boot log:"
>
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 0 -> Node 0
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 1 -> Node 0
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 2 -> Node 0
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> ITS 3 -> Node 1
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: ITS affinity exceeding max count[4]
>>
>> This is wrong on D05 as we have 8 ITSes with 4 NUMA nodes.
>>
>> So dynamically alloc the memory needed instead of using
>> its_srat_maps[MAX_NUMNODES], which count the number of
>> ITS entry(ies) in SRAT and alloc its_srat_maps as needed,
>> then build the mapping of numa node to ITS ID. Of course,
>> its_srat_maps will be freed after ITS probing because
>> we don't need that after boot.
>>
>> After doing this, I got what I wanted:
>>
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 0 -> Node 0
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 1 -> Node 0
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 2 -> Node 0
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> ITS 3 -> Node 1
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> ITS 4 -> Node 2
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> ITS 5 -> Node 2
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> ITS 6 -> Node 2
>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 3 -> ITS 7 -> Node 3
>
> Question (unrelated): how are PCI devices (or better PCI host bridges)
> mapped to ITSs ? I ask because in IORT we currently ignore the notion
> of ITS groups - so it is just out of curiosity (I suspect you have
> a static 1:1 mapping PCI-host-bridge->ITS).
Yes, on D05 we enabled 8 ITSs, and also have 8 PCI hostbridges, here is
the IORT for D05:
https://github.com/hisilicon/OpenPlatformPkg/blob/bb17676e6c529732af8adf438fc2c8ceeb9b3271/Chips/Hisilicon/Hi1616/D05AcpiTables/D05Iort.asl
>
>> Fixes: dbd2b8267233 ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add ACPI NUMA node mapping")
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> - Add NULL check in acpi_get_its_numa_node() for no ITS affinity case;
>> - Free the its_srat_maps after ITS probing.
>>
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Thanks!
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-26 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-22 3:54 Hanjun Guo
2017-07-25 10:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-26 7:52 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-07-26 8:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-26 9:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-07-26 10:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-26 10:03 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-07-25 10:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-07-26 8:11 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2017-07-26 11:05 ` Robin Murphy
2017-07-27 7:36 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-07-25 11:02 ` John Garry
2017-07-26 9:47 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-07-26 9:47 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eec017c3-0d41-fb9f-478c-805368f66179@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®