Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples

[Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>]

On 03/28/2017 09:09 PM, Taeung Song wrote:
> Good morning, Arnaldo :)
>
> On 03/28/2017 03:26 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:10:38PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>>> If running 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
>>> you can see a problem showing only zero '0' for number of samples.
>>>
>>> Before:
>>>     $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
>>> ...
>>>        0 :        400816:       push   %rbp
>>>        0 :        400817:       mov    %rsp,%rbp
>>>        0 :        40081a:       mov    %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
>>>        0 :        40081d:       mov    %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
>>>        0 :        400821:       mov    -0x24(%rbp),%eax
>>>        0 :        400824:       mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
>>>        0 :        400828:       mov    (%rdx),%esi
>>>        0 :        40082a:       mov    $0x0,%edx
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The reason is number of samples aren't set
>>> in symbol__get_source_line(). so set it ordinarily.
>>
>> Can you please take a look at:
>>
>>   0c4a5bcea460 ("perf annotate: Display total number of samples with
>> --show-total-period")
>>
>> that introduced the --show-total-period code and take it into account in
>> this fix?
>>
>> I.e. from a quick look it did the calculation setting that field in the
>> TUI code, where it should have done in the util/annotate.c file, so that
>> all UIs would be able to use it.
>>

Sorry, I misunderstood what you said.

Already there is the calculation setting in util/annotate.c
Because of the cset e64aa75bf5 ("perf annotate browser: Use 
disasm__calc_percent()") by Namhyung.

So I think that we don't need to do as you guess.


Thanks,
Taeung

>> After your analysis, please add a Fixes: that cset, ok?
>>
>> I applied the other two patches and added Martin to the CC list, as he
>> is the author of that patch and may have something to say here.
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>>
>
> Okey! I look into the cset 0c4a5bcea460.
>
> It is fine but if running 'show-total-period' with '-l',
> the problem happen. The reason is to miss setting number of samples
> for source_line_samples, so will send v4 added Fixes: and Cc: Martin
> (and a bit changed commit log message)
>
> Thanks,
> Taeung