From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: simplify the is-owner-spinnable checks
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 13:00:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eedd968a-3ebf-4f71-6b02-81ce45fdff15@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180518165534.GA22348@redhat.com>
On 05/18/2018 12:55 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Add the trivial owner_on_cpu() helper for rwsem_can_spin_on_owner() and
> rwsem_spin_on_owner(), it also allows to make rwsem_can_spin_on_owner()
> a bit more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> index a903367..3064c50 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,15 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> }
> }
>
> +static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
> +{
> + /*
> + * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
> + * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
> + */
> + return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
> +}
> +
> static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> struct task_struct *owner;
> @@ -359,17 +368,10 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
> - if (!owner || !is_rwsem_owner_spinnable(owner)) {
> - ret = !owner; /* !owner is spinnable */
> - goto done;
> + if (owner) {
> + ret = is_rwsem_owner_spinnable(owner) &&
> + owner_on_cpu(owner);
> }
> -
> - /*
> - * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if task is not
> - * on cpu or its cpu is preempted
> - */
> - ret = owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
> -done:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -398,8 +400,7 @@ static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> * abort spinning when need_resched or owner is not running or
> * owner's cpu is preempted.
> */
> - if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
> - vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
> + if (need_resched() || !owner_on_cpu(owner)) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return false;
> }
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-15 21:49 [PATCH v4 0/2] locking/rwsem: Fix DEBUG_RWSEM warning from thaw_super() Waiman Long
2018-05-15 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add a new RWSEM_ANONYMOUSLY_OWNED flag Waiman Long
2018-05-16 10:34 ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2018-05-16 10:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-16 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 13:11 ` Waiman Long
2018-05-16 15:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-16 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-18 7:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 8:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-18 9:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 16:55 ` [PATCH] locking/rwsem: simplify the is-owner-spinnable checks Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-18 17:00 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-05-25 9:51 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Simplify " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-15 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Annotate rwsem ownership transfer by setting RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN Waiman Long
2018-05-16 5:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-05-16 13:17 ` Waiman Long
2018-05-16 10:35 ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eedd968a-3ebf-4f71-6b02-81ce45fdff15@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome