mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: simplify the is-owner-spinnable checks
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 13:00:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eedd968a-3ebf-4f71-6b02-81ce45fdff15@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180518165534.GA22348@redhat.com>

On 05/18/2018 12:55 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Add the trivial owner_on_cpu() helper for rwsem_can_spin_on_owner() and
> rwsem_spin_on_owner(), it also allows to make rwsem_can_spin_on_owner()
> a bit more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> index a903367..3064c50 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,15 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool owner_on_cpu(struct task_struct *owner)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if
> +	 * task is not on cpu or its cpu is preempted
> +	 */
> +	return owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *owner;
> @@ -359,17 +368,10 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
> -	if (!owner || !is_rwsem_owner_spinnable(owner)) {
> -		ret = !owner;	/* !owner is spinnable */
> -		goto done;
> +	if (owner) {
> +		ret = is_rwsem_owner_spinnable(owner) &&
> +		      owner_on_cpu(owner);
>  	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * As lock holder preemption issue, we both skip spinning if task is not
> -	 * on cpu or its cpu is preempted
> -	 */
> -	ret = owner->on_cpu && !vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner));
> -done:
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -398,8 +400,7 @@ static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>  		 * abort spinning when need_resched or owner is not running or
>  		 * owner's cpu is preempted.
>  		 */
> -		if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
> -				vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
> +		if (need_resched() || !owner_on_cpu(owner)) {
>  			rcu_read_unlock();
>  			return false;
>  		}

Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-18 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-15 21:49 [PATCH v4 0/2] locking/rwsem: Fix DEBUG_RWSEM warning from thaw_super() Waiman Long
2018-05-15 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add a new RWSEM_ANONYMOUSLY_OWNED flag Waiman Long
2018-05-16 10:34   ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2018-05-16 10:48   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-16 11:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-16 13:11     ` Waiman Long
2018-05-16 15:27       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-16 12:19   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-18  7:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18  8:41       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-18  9:40         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 16:55           ` [PATCH] locking/rwsem: simplify the is-owner-spinnable checks Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-18 17:00             ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-05-25  9:51             ` [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Simplify " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2018-05-15 21:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Annotate rwsem ownership transfer by setting RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN Waiman Long
2018-05-16  5:37   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-05-16 13:17     ` Waiman Long
2018-05-16 10:35   ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eedd968a-3ebf-4f71-6b02-81ce45fdff15@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome