Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: Extract irq_set_affinity_masks() from devm_platform_get_irqs_affinity()

[John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>]

On 17/02/2022 17:17, Marc Zyngier wrote:

Hi Marc,

>> I know you mentioned it in 2/2, but it would be interesting to see how
>> network controller drivers can handle the problem of missing in-flight
>> IO completions for managed irq shutdown. For storage controllers this
>> is all now safely handled in the block layer.
> 
> Do you have a pointer to this? It'd be interesting to see if there is
> a common pattern.

Check blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline() and other hotplug handler friends in 
block/blk-mq.c and also blk_mq_get_ctx()/blk_mq_map_queue()

So the key steps in CPU offlining are:
- when the last CPU in HW queue context cpumask is going offline we mark 
the HW queue as inactive and no longer queue requests there
- drain all in-flight requests before we allow that last CPU to go 
offline, meaning that we always have a CPU online to service any 
completion interrupts

This scheme relies on symmetrical HW submission and completion queues 
and also that the blk-mq HW queue context cpumask is same as the HW 
queue's IRQ affinity mask (see blk_mq_pci_map_queues()).

I am not sure how much this would fit with the networking stack or that 
marvell driver.

Thanks,
John