From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF10C4CEC9 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 05:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF2D214AF for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 05:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727315AbfIRF7K (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 01:59:10 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:19499 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725834AbfIRF7K (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 01:59:10 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2019 22:59:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,519,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="189161370" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2019 22:59:09 -0700 Received: from [10.226.38.20] (unknown [10.226.38.20]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645335800B9; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] spi: cadence-qspi: Add QSPI support for Intel LGM SoC To: Mark Brown Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, qi-ming.wu@intel.com References: <20190916073843.39618-1-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> <20190916073843.39618-3-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> <20190916113255.GA4352@sirena.co.uk> <466b41c1-3d65-0bf4-6db7-d3b3e06b107b@linux.intel.com> <20190917153650.GF3524@sirena.co.uk> From: "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:59:06 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190917153650.GF3524@sirena.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark,    Thank you for the review comments. On 17/9/2019 11:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:11:28AM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote: > >> *    spi-cadence.c* in *drivers/spi/*, which supports very old legacy >> cadence-spi based devices(normal) >> *    cadence-quadspi.c(drivers/mtd/spi-nor/)* : specific support to SPI-NOR >> flash with new spi-nor layer. >>     all the API's in this driver purely on spi-nor specific, so couldn't >> proceed to adapt. > Are these completely separate IPs or are they just different versions of > the same IP? These are same IPs , but different features Enabled/Disabled depends upon the SoC vendors. for e.g: Intel LGM SoC uses the same IP, but without DMA and Direct access controller. also dedicated support to flash devices. Best regards Vadivel