From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org
Cc: baolin.wang7@gmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Some cleanups and improvements for blk-iocost
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:19:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef1ebb96-3e2b-44e9-f7dd-463124921747@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1606378475.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Hi Jens,
> Hi,
>
> This patch set did some cleanups and improvements for blk-iocost, and
> no big functional changes. Please help to review. Thanks.
>
> Changes from v1:
> - Add acked-by tag from Tejun.
> - Drop 2 unnecessary patches.
> - Move the related variable declarations inside the block together
> with the code in patch 3.
> - Move the commit_weights() into ioc_check_iocgs().
> - Move more related logics of adjusting base vrate into the
> ioc_adjust_base_vrate().
> - Rename the new functions.
Could you take this patch set if no objection from your side? Thanks.
>
> Baolin Wang (5):
> blk-iocost: Fix some typos in comments
> blk-iocost: Remove unnecessary advance declaration
> blk-iocost: Move the usage ratio calculation to the correct place
> blk-iocost: Factor out the active iocgs' state check into a separate
> function
> blk-iocost: Factor out the base vrate change into a separate function
>
> block/blk-iocost.c | 251 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-07 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-26 8:16 Baolin Wang
2020-11-26 8:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] blk-iocost: Fix some typos in comments Baolin Wang
2020-11-26 8:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] blk-iocost: Remove unnecessary advance declaration Baolin Wang
2020-11-26 8:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] blk-iocost: Move the usage ratio calculation to the correct place Baolin Wang
2020-12-02 19:56 ` Tejun Heo
2020-11-26 8:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] blk-iocost: Factor out the active iocgs' state check into a separate function Baolin Wang
2020-12-02 19:58 ` Tejun Heo
2020-11-26 8:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] blk-iocost: Factor out the base vrate change " Baolin Wang
2020-12-02 19:59 ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-07 7:19 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2020-12-07 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Some cleanups and improvements for blk-iocost Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef1ebb96-3e2b-44e9-f7dd-463124921747@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®