From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net (003.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74ABE265630; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752514153; cv=none; b=SCI4RuF0xAwKgcs9MlrEhfy3OzXLRq3iyBr81EFpb7Vt9l8KuI8FMRaY2b1sQeNi4fgmDTr2hwxVQdWvhcy6CL9bn4RhO0glBMzn/vqP+T64IIVmbVmcLkp/35wN7HWu67Wze/Py11Z6zlLfRMGP+xkoBDv09OWq/epNMwd487E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752514153; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SUY+mA54gj2mVgNyrXv6SgFTk3a/RhARaO8UlwEzOjU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kA0VJWxZqXoXVmeFFslOnMmAB6lxwXEO3GFPcbdLmEsWPZHmo08w64J02kkiKoXhFBBYQdoDPBo4EaipBqa9KbzKQhNpJa88hGhDWhtnK7vwFg8XelsHCDssXC4QyzhkTJwjYko39zjBllKZbcTL9DET8cnJeJR2s0J9bIkzRP0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=qeys7ip/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="qeys7ip/" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bgq7B2pmfzlngSF; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:29:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1752514148; x=1755106149; bh=A3o518QAyKyHrEr+zFPEn2j6 kZg4PTQ65nmlzov72rQ=; b=qeys7ip/Koaqfl+uVm/xPKSlonOfusJ2Jet1zzyw 5R6Ps1hBswnWYqLhEpTIZDPU5pOxm0PYclO1FjeI8cONL1AiviuwabXVpEfNFi/M QRrtfjgwJpcwtyV4wq1XuGCUe879aYYQBLqC9LCbjYV+hnhW30xaU+ipLtNQmCn2 +Xnw6+fD1B+n4s7YldcNNHFFj75klYWVwjCEU6yTNqqVnXzkpHkEcDPw176HnNAT EDbxWZetFmwr3cJPjmySs3XHlescfLPx2s2rjWqYkgVMCno9IxhepgB2oyP0/9vM DRlLNl2fQEjgmA2VaXdMvvc2BWTKKdvFX+UZBghmVVq0pA== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (003.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id CLmEdSVDWbWD; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bgq6y4Xkkzlfl2g; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:28:56 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Update esi_vec_mask for HW major version >= 6 To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam , Nitin Rawat , James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, ebiggers@google.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Bao D. Nguyen" References: <20250707210300.561-1-quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> <20250707210300.561-2-quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> <5a1bd678-c935-4c1b-812d-a249f1caebb7@acm.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/14/25 10:25 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>> Maybe we should get rid of 'scsi' prefix since the ufs code is now >>> moved outside of drivers/scsi/. Bart? > >> Dropping the "scsi:" prefix sounds good to me because this prefix makes >> patch subject lines a bit long. > > I have attempting separating SCSI and UFS a couple of times in the past. > However, there always seemed to be at least one SCSI core change > dependency per cycle which prevented that from happening. > > I don't think we have had any for a while so I'll try to do two separate > trees for 6.18. Hi Martin, Thanks for the feedback, but please keep in mind that I plan to repost this patch series soon, a series that includes SCSI core and UFS driver changes: "[PATCH 00/24] Optimize the hot path in the UFS driver" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20250403211937.2225615-1-bvanassche@acm.org/). For the future, I expect such patch changes to be the exception rather than the norm. Thanks, Bart.