From: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@gmail.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Disable TDP MMU when running on Hyper-V
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 16:42:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef5f6c79-3c75-1bda-80d3-bb6d84cc27b2@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a60ozxga.fsf@redhat.com>
On 07/03/2023 11:07, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com> writes:
>
>> On 06/03/2023 18:52, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> TDP MMU has been broken on AMD CPUs when running on Hyper-V since v5.17.
>>>> The issue was first introduced by two commmits:
>>>>
>>>> - bb95dfb9e2dfbe6b3f5eb5e8a20e0259dadbe906 "KVM: x86/mmu: Defer TLB
>>>> flush to caller when freeing TDP MMU shadow pages"
>>>> - efd995dae5eba57c5d28d6886a85298b390a4f07 "KVM: x86/mmu: Zap defunct
>>>> roots via asynchronous worker"
>>>>
>>>> The root cause is that since then there are missing TLB flushes which
>>>> are required by HV_X64_NESTED_ENLIGHTENED_TLB.
>>>
>>> Please share more details on what's actually missing as you get them,
>>> I'd like to understand which flushes can be legally avoided on bare
>>> hardware and Hyper-V/VMX but not on Hyper-V/SVM.
>>>
>>
>> See the linked thread here
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20d189fc-8d20-8083-b448-460cc0420151@linux.microsoft.com/#t
>> for all the details/analyses but the summary was that either of these 2
>> options would work, with a) having less flushes (footnote: less flushes is not necessarily
>> better):
>>
>> a) adding a hyperv_flush_guest_mapping(__pa(root->spt) after kvm_tdp_mmu_get_vcpu_root_hpa's call to tdp_mmu_alloc_sp()
>> b) adding a hyperv_flush_guest_mapping(vcpu->arch.mmu->root.hpa) to svm_flush_tlb_current()
>>
>> These are only needed on Hyper-V/SVM because of how the enlightenment works (needs an explicit
>> flush to rebuild L0 shadow page tables). Hyper-V/VMX does not need any changes and currently
>> works. Let me know if you need more information on something here, I'll try to get it.
>>
>
> Ah, I missed the whole party! Thanks for the pointers!
>
>>>> The failure manifests
>>>> as L2 guest VMs being unable to complete boot due to memory
>>>> inconsistencies between L1 and L2 guests which lead to various
>>>> assertion/emulation failures.
>
> Which levels are we talking about here, *real* L1 and L2 or L1 and L2
> from KVM's perspective (real L2 and L3)?
Real L1 and L2. In this whole discussion L0 is Hyper-V, L1 is KVM and L2 is a Linux VM.
>
>>>>
>>>> The HV_X64_NESTED_ENLIGHTENED_TLB enlightenment is always exposed by
>>>> Hyper-V on AMD and is always used by Linux. The TLB flush required by
>>>> HV_X64_NESTED_ENLIGHTENED_TLB is much stricter than the local TLB flush
>>>> that TDP MMU wants to issue. We have also found that with TDP MMU L2 guest
>>>> boot performance on AMD is reproducibly slower compared to when TDP MMU is
>>>> disabled.
>>>>
>>>> Disable TDP MMU when using SVM Hyper-V for the time being while we
>>>> search for a better fix.
>>>
>>> I'd suggest we go the other way around: disable
>>> HV_X64_NESTED_ENLIGHTENED_TLB on SVM:
>>
>> Paolo suggested disabling TDP_MMU when HV_X64_NESTED_ENLIGHTENED_TLB is used, and
>> I prefer that option too. The enlighenment does offer a nice performance advantage
>> with non-TDP_MMU, and I did not see TDP_MMU perform any better compared to that.
>> Afaik the code to use the enlightenment on Hyper-V/SVM was written/tested before
>> TDP_MMU became the default.
>>
>> If you have a specific scenario in mind, we could test and see what the implications
>> are there.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion here, I've suggested a smaller change so
> it's easier to backport it to stable kernels and easier to revert when a
> proper fix comes to mainline.
Noted. My concern here is about changing a default in a way that lowers performance,
because the proper fix that comes later might end up not being suitable for stable.
> For performance implication, I'd only
> consider non-nested scenarios from KVM's perspective (i.e. real L2 from
> Hyper-V's PoV), as running L3 is unlikely a common use-case and, if I
> understood correctly, is broken anyway.
I agree with that. Right now L2 is broken, I've never even attempted L3 to
see if it would work.
Jeremi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-27 17:17 Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-03-06 17:52 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-03-06 18:31 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-03-07 10:07 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-03-08 15:42 ` Jeremi Piotrowski [this message]
2023-03-07 17:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-08 0:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-08 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-08 15:55 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-03-08 17:22 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-03-08 19:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-08 19:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-09 17:58 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-03-12 17:42 ` Alexander Grest
2023-03-08 15:48 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-04-05 16:43 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-04-10 23:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-11 14:22 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-04-11 16:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-13 9:53 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-04-13 17:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-13 18:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-13 19:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-13 20:21 ` David Matlack
2023-04-13 20:58 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef5f6c79-3c75-1bda-80d3-bb6d84cc27b2@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltykernel@gmail.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®