Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix issues with ARM Processor CPER records

[Daniel Ferguson <danielf@os.amperecomputing.com>]

On 10/14/2024 3:00 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 13:57, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:07:13AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Jason Tian (1):
>>>   RAS: Report all ARM processor CPER information to userspace
>>>
>>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab (4):
>>>   efi/cper: Adjust infopfx size to accept an extra space
>>>   efi/cper: Add a new helper function to print bitmasks
>>>   efi/cper: align ARM CPER type with UEFI 2.9A/2.10 specs
>>>   docs: efi: add CPER functions to driver-api
>>>
>>>  .../driver-api/firmware/efi/index.rst         | 11 +++-
>>>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c                      | 27 ++++----
>>>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper-arm.c               | 52 ++++++++--------
>>>  drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c                   | 62 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  drivers/ras/ras.c                             | 41 +++++++++++-
>>>  include/linux/cper.h                          | 12 ++--
>>>  include/linux/ras.h                           | 16 ++++-
>>>  include/ras/ras_event.h                       | 48 ++++++++++++--
>>>  8 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>
>> With the issues to patch 1 fixed:
>>
>> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
>>
>> I'm presuming this'll go through Ard's tree. Alternatively, I can pick it up
>> too with Ard's ack.
>>
> 
> Either works for me.
> 
> Mauro: please put all maintainers on cc of the code you are touching - thanks.

What can I do to help this patch move forward?
I noticed it needs to be rebased as of kernel v6.15.

Would it be helpful if I were to rebase, add all the maintainers to the cc, and
resubmit ?

I did rebase to v6.15 and tested. Everything still seems good to go.