From: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] timekeeping: Fix cross-timestamp interpolation for non-x86
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:11:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <efcc7ddf-8845-11c4-fca7-0eecabfa64a4@opensynergy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANDhNCq38sESJqYS8+onu9G4FS--JR6pF0fA6wJXwSDon6QkRw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 6:04 John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 6:20 PM Peter Hilber
> <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com> wrote:
>>
>> So far, get_device_system_crosststamp() unconditionally passes
>> system_counterval.cycles to timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(). But when
>> interpolating system time (do_interp == true), system_counterval.cycles is
>> before tkr_mono.cycle_last, contrary to the timekeeping_cycles_to_ns()
>> expectations.
>>
>> On x86, CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE will mitigate on
>> interpolating, setting delta to 0. With delta == 0, xtstamp->sys_monoraw
>> and xtstamp->sys_realtime are then set to the last update time, as
>> implicitly expected by adjust_historical_crosststamp(). On other
>> architectures, the resulting nonsense xtstamp->sys_monoraw and
>> xtstamp->sys_realtime corrupt the xtstamp (ts) adjustment in
>> adjust_historical_crosststamp().
>>
>> Fix this by deriving xtstamp->sys_monoraw and xtstamp->sys_realtime from
>> the last update time when interpolating, by using the local variable
>> "cycles". The local variable already has the right value when
>> interpolating, unlike system_counterval.cycles.
>>
>> Fixes: 2c756feb18d9 ("time: Add history to cross timestamp interface supporting slower devices")
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@opensynergy.com>
>
> Thanks again for iterating on this. This looks much better!
>
> Now, I've never had an environment that used this logic, so I'm
> trusting you've tested it well?
>
> Assuming so:
> Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Thanks for re-reviewing!
I did automated tests with various chrony [1] configurations. The tests
check that all PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE2 ioctls issued by chrony are
successful for a combined test time of many hours, and that the
cross-timestamps look plausible.
I will add a description of the relevant tests when changing the series to
non-RFC.
[1] https://chrony-project.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 1:20 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Add virtio_rtc module and related changes Peter Hilber
2023-08-18 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] timekeeping: Fix cross-timestamp interpolation on counter wrap Peter Hilber
2023-08-18 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] timekeeping: Fix cross-timestamp interpolation corner case decision Peter Hilber
2023-08-25 4:02 ` John Stultz
2023-09-15 16:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-15 17:30 ` Peter Hilber
2023-09-15 19:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-18 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] timekeeping: Fix cross-timestamp interpolation for non-x86 Peter Hilber
2023-08-25 4:04 ` John Stultz
2023-09-13 9:11 ` Peter Hilber [this message]
2023-08-18 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] virtio_rtc: Add module and driver core Peter Hilber
2023-08-18 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] virtio_rtc: Add PTP clocks Peter Hilber
2023-08-18 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] virtio_rtc: Add Arm Generic Timer cross-timestamping Peter Hilber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=efcc7ddf-8845-11c4-fca7-0eecabfa64a4@opensynergy.com \
--to=peter.hilber@opensynergy.com \
--cc=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®