From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: fix stalls for packed rings
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:13:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <efe3c06f-0a80-c266-c7fc-ac33901f51c7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191027100705.11644-1-mst@redhat.com>
On 2019/10/27 下午6:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> From: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
>
> When VIRTIO_F_RING_EVENT_IDX is negotiated, virtio devices can
> use virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed to reduce the number of device
> interrupts. At the moment, this is the case for virtio-net when the
> napi_tx module parameter is set to false.
>
> In this case, the virtio driver selects an event offset and expects that
> the device will send a notification when rolling over the event offset
> in the ring. However, if this roll-over happens before the event
> suppression structure update, the notification won't be sent. To address
> this race condition the driver needs to check wether the device rolled
> over the offset after updating the event suppression structure.
>
> With VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED, the virtio driver did this by reading the
> flags field of the descriptor at the specified offset.
>
> Unfortunately, checking at the event offset isn't reliable: if
> descriptors are chained (e.g. when INDIRECT is off) not all descriptors
> are overwritten by the device, so it's possible that the device skipped
> the specific descriptor driver is checking when writing out used
> descriptors. If this happens, the driver won't detect the race condition
> and will incorrectly expect the device to send a notification.
>
> For virtio-net, the result will be a TX queue stall, with the
> transmission getting blocked forever.
>
> With the packed ring, it isn't easy to find a location which is
> guaranteed to change upon the roll-over, except the next device
> descriptor, as described in the spec:
>
> Writes of device and driver descriptors can generally be
> reordered, but each side (driver and device) are only required to
> poll (or test) a single location in memory: the next device descriptor after
> the one they processed previously, in circular order.
>
> while this might be sub-optimal, let's do exactly this for now.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: f51f982682e2a ("virtio_ring: leverage event idx in packed ring")
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> So this is what I have in my tree now - this is just Marvin's patch
> with a tweaked description.
>
>
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index bdc08244a648..a8041e451e9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1499,9 +1499,6 @@ static bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> * counter first before updating event flags.
> */
> virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
> - } else {
> - used_idx = vq->last_used_idx;
> - wrap_counter = vq->packed.used_wrap_counter;
> }
>
> if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow == VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE) {
> @@ -1518,7 +1515,9 @@ static bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> */
> virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
>
> - if (is_used_desc_packed(vq, used_idx, wrap_counter)) {
> + if (is_used_desc_packed(vq,
> + vq->last_used_idx,
> + vq->packed.used_wrap_counter)) {
> END_USE(vq);
> return false;
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-27 10:08 Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20191028065918.8487020873@mail.kernel.org>
2019-10-28 7:12 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-28 7:13 ` Jason Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=efe3c06f-0a80-c266-c7fc-ac33901f51c7@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®