Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/482] 6.10.14-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>]

On 10/10/2024 11:40, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 09/10/2024 22:59, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 14:01:03 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.14 release.
>>>> There are 482 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:55:15 +0000.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.14-rc1.gz
>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>> All tests passing for Tegra ...
>>>
>>> Test results for stable-v6.10:
>>>    10 builds:    10 pass, 0 fail
>>>    26 boots:    26 pass, 0 fail
>>>    116 tests:    116 pass, 0 fail
>>>
>>> Linux version:    6.10.14-rc1-gd44129966591
>>> Boards tested:    tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
>>>                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
>>>                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
>>>                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>>
>> Did this one not fail on the same cgroup issue as 6.11? we had the
>> offending commit in all trees.
> 
> 
> I did not see any failure there. However, same tests are run and so it 
> should have. I can run it again to double check.


I doubled checked and I don't see warning with this kernel. Odd.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic