From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=hqT0=XE=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB7BC4740C
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  9 Sep 2019 21:23:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA07218DE
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon,  9 Sep 2019 21:23:27 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redchan.it header.i=@redchan.it header.b="uSADzH9P"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2391820AbfIIVX0 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:23:26 -0400
Received: from mx1.cock.li ([185.10.68.5]:58913 "EHLO cock.li"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726930AbfIIVX0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:23:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=redchan.it; s=mail;
        t=1568064203; bh=1XEKiW8lRosRp7rTNF760ZAE09CwkhitKBAyDD8ktjc=;
        h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
        b=uSADzH9PiLbC8Nd7LhtoeXHx+ru3qjS6/C0qq6wHdXRufGWUfITmYQCrfEGsszk1b
         3M4eY/Amp2ynWQUQtQZ6yfrS1ggioa46HVOuP9VUbaVpKoqWlDsll4ijT/bdlmGfD9
         PEy93cL/seQOwchXu+0dCq5J9L/VYPF/n5ErkwqbDq1NX93gFX+X5cvc1pCzZs/TRV
         NA1SuE/vHMdVMps4rXUz2Rw2wWjkO57A2iueQJIQF7oRhzEaIuoSgmKFx0HABLhSyE
         uvYSQkj184K/FeAhz1Y7nqYsTwo5dIxFqoMOU6AjBbjCPQewgj7CQQlCD+01sdDspv
         NV6ARha3YaP6w==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Mon, 09 Sep 2019 21:23:22 +0000
From:   gameonlinux@redchan.it
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Why isn't Grsecurity being sued for its long standing GPL
 violations??
Message-ID: <f009c26462922b125d65a21041e22f12@redchan.it>
X-Sender: gameonlinux@redchan.it
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi, RMS and Bruce Perens;

I noticed that recently Grsecurity's Brad Spengler (who sued you, Bruce, 
for speaking the truth), decided to "Flex" and basically advertise while 
chastising the linux community:

news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20874470


Another poster then pointed out the history of Grsecurity's copyright 
violations (as a derivative work that is restricting redistribution), 
but said he didn't want to say to much, because he didn't want to get 
sued. He referenced your good write-up on the situation: 
perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/

(Which has not changed)

Why isn't Grsecurity being sued for it's copyright violations? They've 
been going on for years now. Clearly their scheme works: it can be shown 
to a court both the attempt to restrict redistribution was tendered (the 
agreement) and that said attempt has been successful.

Also isn't Open Source Security simply an alter-ego of Brad Spengler? 
Him being the only employee? Couldn't the corporate veil be pierced and 
he be found personally liable for any damages?