From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] UBI: Do not zero out EC and VID when multi-pass writes are not supported
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:18:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f013d7af-6e1d-5b8f-4a23-7f6c150f896a@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201012180404.6476-3-p.yadav@ti.com>
On 10/12/20 11:34 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> For NOR flashes EC and VID are zeroed out before an erase is issued to
> make sure UBI does not mistakenly treat the PEB as used and associate it
> with an LEB.
>
> But on some flashes, like the Cypress Semper S28 SPI NOR flash family,
> multi-pass page programming is not allowed on the default ECC scheme.
> This means zeroing out these magic numbers will result in the flash
> throwing a page programming error.
>
> Do not zero out EC and VID when multi-pass writes are not supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
> index 14d890b00d2c..4023fc4886e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ int ubi_io_sync_erase(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture)
> return -EROFS;
> }
>
> - if (ubi->nor_flash) {
> + if (ubi->nor_flash && !(ubi->mtd->flags & MTD_NO_MULTI_PASS_WRITE)) {
> err = nor_erase_prepare(ubi, pnum);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
You may want to get rid of assertion for mtd->writesize != 1 in case of
MTD_NORFLASH.
See drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c::631
if (ubi->mtd->type == MTD_NORFLASH) {
ubi_assert(ubi->mtd->writesize == 1);
ubi->nor_flash = 1;
}
Regards
Vignesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 18:04 [PATCH 0/3] mtd: Make sure UBIFS does not do multi-pass page programming on flashes that don't support it Pratyush Yadav
2020-10-12 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] mtd: abi: Introduce MTD_NO_MULTI_PASS_WRITE Pratyush Yadav
2020-10-12 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] UBI: Do not zero out EC and VID when multi-pass writes are not supported Pratyush Yadav
2020-11-03 11:48 ` Vignesh Raghavendra [this message]
2020-11-03 11:59 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-11-03 12:47 ` Pratyush Yadav
2020-10-12 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: core: Introduce SPI_NOR_NO_MULTI_PASS_PP Pratyush Yadav
2020-10-27 11:18 ` [PATCH 0/3] mtd: Make sure UBIFS does not do multi-pass page programming on flashes that don't support it Pratyush Yadav
2020-10-31 21:44 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-11-03 11:35 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2020-11-03 12:45 ` Pratyush Yadav
2020-11-05 12:21 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2020-11-05 13:19 ` Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f013d7af-6e1d-5b8f-4a23-7f6c150f896a@ti.com \
--to=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®