From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, namhyung@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, bp@alien8.de, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sandipan.das@amd.com, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
santosh.shukla@amd.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] perf/core: Remove pmu linear searching code
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 10:46:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f02c78e2-34b9-4985-640a-279dae1004a9@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230524214133.GA2359762@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Hi Nathan,
On 25-May-23 3:11 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Ravi,
>
> + arm64 KVM folks
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:30:02PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> Searching for the right pmu by iterating over all pmus is no longer
>> required since all pmus now *must* be present in the 'pmu_idr' list.
>> So, remove linear searching code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/events/core.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index 0695bb9fbbb6..eba2b8595115 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -11630,38 +11630,27 @@ static struct pmu *perf_init_event(struct perf_event *event)
>> }
>>
>> again:
>> + ret = -ENOENT;
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> pmu = idr_find(&pmu_idr, type);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> - if (pmu) {
>> - if (event->attr.type != type && type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
>> - !(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE))
>> - goto fail;
>> -
>> - ret = perf_try_init_event(pmu, event);
>> - if (ret == -ENOENT && event->attr.type != type && !extended_type) {
>> - type = event->attr.type;
>> - goto again;
>> - }
>> + if (!pmu)
>> + goto fail;
>>
>> - if (ret)
>> - pmu = ERR_PTR(ret);
>> + if (event->attr.type != type && type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
>> + !(pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE))
>> + goto fail;
>>
>> - goto unlock;
>> + ret = perf_try_init_event(pmu, event);
>> + if (ret == -ENOENT && event->attr.type != type && !extended_type) {
>> + type = event->attr.type;
>> + goto again;
>> }
>>
>> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry, lockdep_is_held(&pmus_srcu)) {
>> - ret = perf_try_init_event(pmu, event);
>> - if (!ret)
>> - goto unlock;
>> -
>> - if (ret != -ENOENT) {
>> - pmu = ERR_PTR(ret);
>> - goto unlock;
>> - }
>> - }
>> fail:
>> - pmu = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> + if (ret)
>> + pmu = ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +
>> unlock:
>> srcu_read_unlock(&pmus_srcu, idx);
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.0
>>
>
> My apologies if this has already been reported or fixed already, I did a
> search of lore.kernel.org and did not find anything. This patch as
> commit 9551fbb64d09 ("perf/core: Remove pmu linear searching code") in
> -next breaks starting QEMU with KVM enabled on two of my arm64 machines:
>
> $ qemu-system-aarch64 \
> -display none \
> -nodefaults \
> -machine virt,gic-version=max \
> -append 'console=ttyAMA0 earlycon' \
> -kernel arch/arm64/boot/Image.gz \
> -initrd rootfs.cpio \
> -cpu host \
> -enable-kvm \
> -m 512m \
> -smp 8 \
> -serial mon:stdio
> qemu-system-aarch64: PMU: KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR: No such device
> qemu-system-aarch64: failed to set irq for PMU
>
> In the kernel log, I see
>
> [ 42.944952] kvm: pmu event creation failed -2
>
> I am not sure if this issue is unexpected as a result of this change or
> if there is something that needs to change on the arm64 KVM side (it
> appears the kernel message comes from arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c).
Thanks for reporting it.
Based on these detail, I feel the pmu registration failed in the host,
most probably because pmu driver did not pass pmu name while calling
perf_pmu_register(). Consequently kvm also failed while trying to use
it for guest. Can you please check host kernel logs.
I'm sorry but I neither have Arm board to try myself not I'm familiar
with the Arm architecture. So I'll need your help to diagnose it.
Ravi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-04 10:59 [PATCH v4 0/4] perf: Rework event forwarding logic Ravi Bangoria
2023-05-04 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] perf/core: Rework forwarding of {task|cpu}-clock events Ravi Bangoria
2023-05-10 13:33 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Ravi Bangoria
2024-02-20 8:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] " Pengfei Xu
2024-02-23 5:27 ` Ravi Bangoria
2024-02-28 12:49 ` Ravi Bangoria
2024-02-29 3:41 ` Pengfei Xu
2023-05-04 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] perf/ibs: Fix interface via core pmu events Ravi Bangoria
2023-05-10 13:33 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Ravi Bangoria
2023-05-04 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] perf/core: Remove pmu linear searching code Ravi Bangoria
2023-05-10 13:33 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Ravi Bangoria
2023-05-24 21:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] " Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-25 5:16 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2023-05-25 7:11 ` Oliver Upton
2023-05-25 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-25 15:56 ` Oliver Upton
2023-05-26 23:00 ` Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 13:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-05-27 17:00 ` Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 17:05 ` Ian Rogers
2023-05-27 18:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-05-27 19:50 ` Ian Rogers
2023-05-30 7:45 ` Thomas Richter
2023-05-30 14:00 ` Ian Rogers
2023-05-31 9:09 ` Thomas Richter
[not found] ` <CAP-5=fVw3vSEu7yGFDnZi8c3VUFJu_XEZtY9ZcTsD7ip2imR6Q@mail.gmail.com>
2023-06-01 11:02 ` Thomas Richter
2023-06-01 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-25 15:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-04 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] perf test: Add selftest to test IBS invocation via core pmu events Ravi Bangoria
2023-05-05 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-15 21:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-05-15 21:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-05-10 13:33 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f02c78e2-34b9-4985-640a-279dae1004a9@amd.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®