From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423212AbcFMW75 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:59:57 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:47550 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422900AbcFMW74 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:59:56 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,468,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="827382735" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table loading To: "Zheng, Lv" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BBA2A9A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BBA4649@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <76932cf4-c292-d711-d390-f451b66c3f9c@intel.com> <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BBCC54B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Brown, Len" , Lv Zheng , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Organization: Intel Technology Poland Sp. z o. o., KRS 101882, ul. Slowackiego 173, 80-298 Gdansk Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:59:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BBCC54B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/12/2016 3:02 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, > >> From: Wysocki, Rafael J >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for >> table loading >> >> On 5/20/2016 2:57 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote: >>> Hi, Rafael >>> >>>> From: rjwysocki@gmail.com [mailto:rjwysocki@gmail.com] On Behalf >> Of >>>> Rafael J. Wysocki >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for >> table >>>> loading >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Zheng, Lv >> wrote: >>>>> Hi, Rafael >>>>> >>>>> Can we queue this up in linux-next? >>>>> ASLTS recursive tests are done in ACPICA upstream and no regressions >> can be >>>> seen. >>>>> We need more tests around this experimental change from the real >> users to >>>> have the chances to learn the unknown cases. >>>>> If they reported regressions, we could stop the regressions by >> reverting >>>> [PATCH 4/4]. >>>>> So it should be safe to do such experiments in the Linux upstream. >>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>> There is a rule that during a merge window linux-next should only >>>> contain material for that merge window. That is, currently linux-next >>>> should only contain material targeted at v4.7. >>>> >>>> For this reason, I can't put the series into linux-next right now, but >>>> I'll do that as soon as 4.7-rc1 is released. >>> [Lv Zheng] >>> Great! >>> Thanks for the information. >> Unfortunately, it is reported that the series actually causes problems >> to happen. >> >> I sent you a CC of my response to the report in question earlier today. > [Lv Zheng] > Could the problem be stopped by reverting PATCH 4/4? Yes, it can. However, would the series be any useful without that patch? Thanks, Rafael