mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, valek@2n.cz, gwendal@chromium.org
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG] iio: light: opt3001: possible deadlock in opt3001_read_raw() and opt3001_irq()
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 23:41:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f04b6000-f128-f928-0e3e-e3acc206d2d1@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

My static analysis tool reports a possible deadlock in the opt3001 
driver in Linux 5.16:

opt3001_read_raw()
   mutex_lock(&opt->lock); --> Line 399 (Lock A)
   opt3001_get_lux()
     wait_event_timeout(opt->result_ready_queue, ...) --> Line 276 (Wait X)
   mutex_lock(&opt->lock); --> Line 412 (Unlock A)

opt3001_irq()
   mutex_lock(&opt->lock); --> Line 693 (Lock A)
   mutex_unlock(&opt->lock); --> Line 730 (Unlock A)
   wake_up(&opt->result_ready_queue); --> Line 733 (Wake X)

When opt3001_read_raw() is executed, "Wait X" is performed by holding 
"Lock A". If opt3001_irq() is executed at this time, "Wake X" cannot be 
performed to wake up "Wait X" in opt3001_read_raw(), because "Lock A" 
has been already hold by opt3001_read_raw(), causing a possible deadlock.
I find that "Wait X" is performed with a timeout, to relieve the 
possible deadlock; but I think this timeout can cause inefficient execution.

I am not quite sure whether this possible problem is real and how to fix 
it if it is real.
Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks :)


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai

             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-07 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 15:41 Jia-Ju Bai [this message]
2022-02-07 20:39 ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f04b6000-f128-f928-0e3e-e3acc206d2d1@gmail.com \
    --to=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=valek@2n.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®