mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: ake <ake@igel.co.jp>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: enable tx after resuming from suspend
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:18:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f04bee7a-3892-102d-2be0-f4fda4048e74@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e8b0747-cc9f-8863-2ee1-2b032d6c0fae@igel.co.jp>


On 2018/10/16 下午6:15, ake wrote:
>
> On 2018年10月16日 17:53, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2018/10/15 下午6:08, ake wrote:
>>> On 2018年10月12日 18:18, ake wrote:
>>>> On 2018年10月12日 17:23, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>> On 2018年10月12日 12:30, ake wrote:
>>>>>> On 2018年10月11日 22:06, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2018年10月11日 18:22, ake wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2018年10月11日 18:44, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2018年10月11日 15:51, Ake Koomsin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> commit 713a98d90c5e ("virtio-net: serialize tx routine during
>>>>>>>>>> reset")
>>>>>>>>>> disabled the virtio tx before going to suspend to avoid a use
>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>> free.
>>>>>>>>>> However, after resuming, it causes the virtio_net device to
>>>>>>>>>> lose its
>>>>>>>>>> network connectivity.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To solve the issue, we need to enable tx after resuming.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes commit 713a98d90c5e ("virtio-net: serialize tx routine
>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>> reset")
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ake Koomsin <ake@igel.co.jp>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>       drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 1 +
>>>>>>>>>>       1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>>>>>>>> index dab504ec5e50..3453d80f5f81 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2256,6 +2256,7 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct
>>>>>>>>>> virtio_device *vdev)
>>>>>>>>>>           }
>>>>>>>>>>             netif_device_attach(vi->dev);
>>>>>>>>>> +    netif_start_queue(vi->dev);
>>>>>>>>> I believe this is duplicated with netif_tx_wake_all_queues() in
>>>>>>>>> netif_device_attach() above?
>>>>>>>> Thank you for your review.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If both netif_tx_wake_all_queues() and netif_start_queue() result in
>>>>>>>> clearing __QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF, then is it possible that some
>>>>>>>> conditions in netif_device_attach() is not satisfied?
>>>>>>> Yes, maybe. One case I can see now is when the device is down, in
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> case netif_device_attach() won't try to wakeup the queue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      Without
>>>>>>>> netif_start_queue(), the virtio_net device does not resume properly
>>>>>>>> after waking up.
>>>>>>> How do you trigger the issue? Just do suspend/resume?
>>>>>> Yes, simply suspend and resume.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is how I trigger the issue:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Start the Virtual Machine Manager GUI program.
>>>>>> 2) Create a guest Linux OS. Make sure that the guest OS kernel is
>>>>>>       >= 4.12. Make sure that it uses virtio_net as its network device.
>>>>>>       In addition, make sure that the video adapter is VGA. Otherwise,
>>>>>>       waking up with the virtual power button does not work.
>>>>>> 3) After installing the guest OS, log in, and test the network
>>>>>>       connectivity by ping the host machine.
>>>>>> 4) Suspend. After this, the screen is blank.
>>>>>> 5) Resume by hitting the virtual power button. The login screen
>>>>>>       appears again.
>>>>>> 6) Log in again. The guest loses its network connection.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my test:
>>>>>> Guest: Ubuntu 16.04/18.04 with kernel 4.15.0-36-generic
>>>>>> Host: Ubuntu 16.04 with kernel 4.15.0-36-generic/4.4.0-137-generic
>>>>> I can not reproduce this issue if virtio-net interface is up in guest
>>>>> before the suspend. I'm using net-next.git and qemu master. But I do
>>>>> reproduce when virtio-net interface is down in guest before suspend,
>>>>> after resume, even if I make it up, the network is still lost.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the interface is up in your case, but please confirm this.
>>>> If you mean the interface state before I hit the suspend button,
>>>> the answer is yes. The interface is up before I suspend the guest
>>>> machine.
>>>>
>>>> Note that my current QEMU version is QEMU emulator version 2.5.0
>>>> (Debian 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.32).
>>>>
>>>> I will try with net-next.git and qemu master later and see if I can
>>>> reproduce the issue.
>>> Update. I tried with net-next and qemu master. Interestingly, the result
>>> is different from yours. The network is lost even if the virtio_net
>>> interface is up before suspending.
>>>
>>> Host: Ubuntu 16.04 with net-next kernel (default configuration)
>>> Guest: Ubuntu 18.04 with net-next kernel (default configuration)
>>> Qemu: master
>>> Qemu command:
>>> qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host -m 2048 -enable-kvm \
>>> -bios /usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE.fd \
>>> -drive file=/var/lib/libvirt/images/virtio_test.qcow2,if=virtio \
>>> -netdev user,id=hostnet0 \
>>> -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0 \
>>> -device VGA,id=video0,vgamem_mb=16 \
>>> -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s3=1 \
>>> -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s4=1 -monitor stdio
>>
>> Interesting, just notice you're using userspace network. To isolate the
>> issue, can you retry with e.g tap or e1000 to make sure it's not a fault
>> of slirp or virito-net?
> I will try.
>
>> Thanks
>>
> There is another thing that I want to discuss. I notice that
> netif_device_detach() should result in setting __QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF if
> the network interface is running. By calling netif_tx_disable() after
> netif_device_detach(), isn't it redundant in case of the network
> interface is running? If the goal is to serialize tx routine, would
> netif_tx_lock() and net_tx_unlock() are more appropriate? Like this:
>
> netif_tx_lock(vi->dev);
> netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
> netif_tx_unlock(vi->dev);
>
> Currently, netif_tx_disable() seems to disturb the symmetry of
> netif_device_detach() and netif_device_attach(). That is the reason
> why you can reproduce the problem when the interface is down before
> suspending.


Yes I agree.

Thanks


  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-17  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-11  7:51 Ake Koomsin
2018-10-11  9:44 ` Jason Wang
2018-10-11 10:22   ` ake
2018-10-11 13:06     ` Jason Wang
2018-10-12  4:30       ` ake
2018-10-12  8:23         ` Jason Wang
2018-10-12  9:18           ` ake
2018-10-15 10:08             ` ake
2018-10-16  8:53               ` Jason Wang
2018-10-16 10:15                 ` ake
2018-10-17  6:18                   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-10-17  7:59                     ` [PATCH v2] virtio_net: avoid using netif_tx_disable() for serializing tx routine Ake Koomsin
2018-10-17  9:02                       ` Jason Wang
2018-10-17 10:44                         ` [PATCH v3] " Ake Koomsin
2018-10-17 12:30                           ` Jason Wang
2018-10-17 15:09                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-10-18  3:25                             ` ake
2018-10-18  5:30                           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f04bee7a-3892-102d-2be0-f4fda4048e74@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=ake@igel.co.jp \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®