From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
To: Pankaj Sharma <pankj.sharma@samsung.com>,
<linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <wg@grandegger.com>, <mkl@pengutronix.de>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<rcsekar@samsung.com>, <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] can: m_can_platform: Bug fix of kernel panic for
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:57:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0550b0b-6681-75a3-c58a-28f5b7ca0821@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1574158838-4616-1-git-send-email-pankj.sharma@samsung.com>
Pankaj
On 11/19/19 4:20 AM, Pankaj Sharma wrote:
> The current code is failing while clock prepare enable because of not
> getting proper clock from platform device.
> A device driver for CAN controller hardware registers itself with the
> Linux network layer as a network device. So, the driver data for m_can
> should ideally be of type net_device.
>
> Further even when passing the proper net device in probe function the
> code was hanging because of the function m_can_runtime_resume() getting
> recursively called from m_can_class_resume().
>
> Pankaj Sharma (2):
> can: m_can_platform: set net_device structure as driver data
> can: m_can_platform: remove unnecessary m_can_class_resume() call
Did you CC: linux-stable for these? We are probably going to have
customers picking up 5.4 LTS and would need these bug fixes.
Or at the very least see if the stable automation will pick these up.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20191119102134epcas5p4d3c1b18203e2001c189b9fa7a0e3aab5@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2019-11-19 10:20 ` Pankaj Sharma
[not found] ` <CGME20191119102155epcas5p34ca3dfaba9eef8de24d1bc9d64ef5335@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2019-11-19 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] can: m_can_platform: set net_device structure as driver data Pankaj Sharma
2019-11-19 14:43 ` Dan Murphy
[not found] ` <CGME20191119102201epcas5p4e215c25d5d07269a7afb1f86fac0be65@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2019-11-19 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] can: m_can_platform: remove unnecessary m_can_class_resume() call Pankaj Sharma
2019-11-19 14:45 ` Dan Murphy
2019-12-05 20:57 ` Dan Murphy [this message]
2019-12-06 6:53 ` [PATCH 0/2] can: m_can_platform: Bug fix of kernel panic for pankj.sharma
2019-12-06 7:39 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0550b0b-6681-75a3-c58a-28f5b7ca0821@ti.com \
--to=dmurphy@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=pankj.sharma@samsung.com \
--cc=rcsekar@samsung.com \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®