From: "Miguel Sousa Filipe" <miguel.filipe@gmail.com>
To: "Diego Calleja" <diegocg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FEATURE REQUEST: merge MD software raid and LVM in one unique layer.
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:51:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f058a9c30705021351i24c7adc2i4c7e8a76e3b8d1bb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070502221045.ad20b915.diegocg@gmail.com>
On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe" <miguel.filipe@gmail.com> escribió:
>
> > I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and two
> > userland tools that provide the same funcionality, which one should I
> > use?
>
> I doubt users care about kernel's design; however the lack of unification of
> userspace tools is a real problem. Just my 2¢.
>
I believe they do, since the kernels desing obviate the need and use
of several diferent tools (that shouldn't be needed) like for instance
for having raid5 with snapshot and dinamic partition resizing we will
allways need:
md-raid5
lvm
some FS.
This md-raid5 and lvm separation is the evidence of how the kernels
design & API affect usability and userspace tools that the user is
obliged to use. I cannot have those features without "bumping" into
this kernel design issue.
This is also a problem for any developer who tries to improve
usability in this area by creating some unified userland tools to
manipulate MD & LVM. (Imagining myself implementing some userland tool
to create some "storage devices" + mount points.. doesn't seem easy
nor fun..).
Best regards,
--
Miguel Sousa Filipe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <f058a9c30705021214k75da330ai4d79a2b6b2806652@mail.gmail.com>
2007-05-02 19:18 ` Miguel Sousa Filipe
2007-05-02 20:10 ` Diego Calleja
2007-05-02 20:51 ` Miguel Sousa Filipe [this message]
2007-05-03 0:58 ` david
2007-05-03 1:33 ` It's a bug of printk? gshan
2007-05-03 8:08 ` FEATURE REQUEST: merge MD software raid and LVM in one unique layer David Greaves
2007-05-03 9:25 ` Miguel Sousa Filipe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f058a9c30705021351i24c7adc2i4c7e8a76e3b8d1bb@mail.gmail.com \
--to=miguel.filipe@gmail.com \
--cc=diegocg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®