From: JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, willy@infradead.org
Cc: George Law <glaw@redhat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] [PATCH v2 1/2] netfs: Fix missing xas_retry() calls in xarray iteration
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:28:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0627b05-1f51-8683-75ad-17e5899efb2b@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166757987929.950645.12595273010425381286.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On 11/5/22 12:37 AM, David Howells wrote:
> netfslib has a number of places in which it performs iteration of an xarray
> whilst being under the RCU read lock. It *should* call xas_retry() as the
> first thing inside of the loop and do "continue" if it returns true in case
> the xarray walker passed out a special value indicating that the walk needs
> to be redone from the root[*].
>
> Fix this by adding the missing retry checks.
>
> [*] I wonder if this should be done inside xas_find(), xas_next_node() and
> suchlike, but I'm told that's not an simple change to effect.
>
> This can cause an oops like that below. Note the faulting address - this
> is an internal value (|0x2) returned from xarray.
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000402
> ...
> RIP: 0010:netfs_rreq_unlock+0xef/0x380 [netfs]
> ...
> Call Trace:
> netfs_rreq_assess+0xa6/0x240 [netfs]
> netfs_readpage+0x173/0x3b0 [netfs]
> ? init_wait_var_entry+0x50/0x50
> filemap_read_page+0x33/0xf0
> filemap_get_pages+0x2f2/0x3f0
> filemap_read+0xaa/0x320
> ? do_filp_open+0xb2/0x150
> ? rmqueue+0x3be/0xe10
> ceph_read_iter+0x1fe/0x680 [ceph]
> ? new_sync_read+0x115/0x1a0
> new_sync_read+0x115/0x1a0
> vfs_read+0xf3/0x180
> ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0
> do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> Fixes: 3d3c95046742 ("netfs: Provide readahead and readpage netfs helpers")
> Reported-by: George Law <glaw@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 16:37 David Howells
2022-11-04 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] netfs: Fix dodgy maths David Howells
2022-11-08 5:54 ` JeffleXu
2022-11-08 15:59 ` David Howells
2022-11-09 5:35 ` [Linux-cachefs] " JeffleXu
2022-11-14 21:26 ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-08 3:28 ` JeffleXu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0627b05-1f51-8683-75ad-17e5899efb2b@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=glaw@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®