mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, willy@infradead.org
Cc: George Law <glaw@redhat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] [PATCH v2 1/2] netfs: Fix missing xas_retry() calls in xarray iteration
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:28:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0627b05-1f51-8683-75ad-17e5899efb2b@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166757987929.950645.12595273010425381286.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>



On 11/5/22 12:37 AM, David Howells wrote:
> netfslib has a number of places in which it performs iteration of an xarray
> whilst being under the RCU read lock.  It *should* call xas_retry() as the
> first thing inside of the loop and do "continue" if it returns true in case
> the xarray walker passed out a special value indicating that the walk needs
> to be redone from the root[*].
> 
> Fix this by adding the missing retry checks.
> 
> [*] I wonder if this should be done inside xas_find(), xas_next_node() and
>     suchlike, but I'm told that's not an simple change to effect.
> 
> This can cause an oops like that below.  Note the faulting address - this
> is an internal value (|0x2) returned from xarray.
> 
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000402
> ...
> RIP: 0010:netfs_rreq_unlock+0xef/0x380 [netfs]
> ...
> Call Trace:
>  netfs_rreq_assess+0xa6/0x240 [netfs]
>  netfs_readpage+0x173/0x3b0 [netfs]
>  ? init_wait_var_entry+0x50/0x50
>  filemap_read_page+0x33/0xf0
>  filemap_get_pages+0x2f2/0x3f0
>  filemap_read+0xaa/0x320
>  ? do_filp_open+0xb2/0x150
>  ? rmqueue+0x3be/0xe10
>  ceph_read_iter+0x1fe/0x680 [ceph]
>  ? new_sync_read+0x115/0x1a0
>  new_sync_read+0x115/0x1a0
>  vfs_read+0xf3/0x180
>  ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0
>  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> 
> Fixes: 3d3c95046742 ("netfs: Provide readahead and readpage netfs helpers")
> Reported-by: George Law <glaw@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> ---

Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>

-- 
Thanks,
Jingbo

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-08  3:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-04 16:37 David Howells
2022-11-04 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] netfs: Fix dodgy maths David Howells
2022-11-08  5:54   ` JeffleXu
2022-11-08 15:59   ` David Howells
2022-11-09  5:35   ` [Linux-cachefs] " JeffleXu
2022-11-14 21:26   ` Jeff Layton
2022-11-08  3:28 ` JeffleXu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0627b05-1f51-8683-75ad-17e5899efb2b@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=glaw@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®