From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
dave@stgolabs.net, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
ira.weiny@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix using wrong GPF DVSEC location issue
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:32:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f066cf58-b29e-4b5c-a22a-413fd9d03edd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250323093110.233040-1-ming.li@zohomail.com>
On 3/23/25 2:31 AM, Li Ming wrote:
> During review all new patches in branch cxl/next. I noticed there may be
> a problem in below commit.
>
> commit a52b6a2c1c99 ("cxl/pci: Support Global Persistent Flush (GPF)")
>
> There is a new field gpf_dvsec in struct cxl_port to cache GPF DVSEC for
> Port(DVSEC ID 04h) location. When the first EP attaching to a cxl port,
> it will trigger locating GPF DVSEC on the cxl dport which the first EP
> is under, then the location is cached in port->gpf_dvsec. So if another
> EP under another dport is attaching, it will reuse the value of
> port->gpf_dvsec as GPF DVSEC location for this another dport. The
> problem is the cached location may be a wrong location for other dports
> of the port.
>
> Per Table 8-2 in CXL r3.2 section 8.1.1 and CXL r3.2 section 8.1.6, Each
> CXL Downstream switch ports and CXL root ports have their own GPF DVSEC
> for Port(DVSEC ID 04h). So my understanding is that CXL subsystem should
> locate GPF DVSEC for Port for each dport rather than using the cached
> location in CXL port.
Applied to cxl/fixes for 6.15-rc
>
> base-commit: 3b5d43245f0a56390baaa670e1b6d898772266b3 cxl/next
>
> v2:
> - Drop RFC tag.
> - Add Fixes tag to patch #1.
> - Pickup reviews.
> - Add tested by Davidlohr.
> - Adjust the changelog of patch #2.(Davidlohr)
> - Fix typo issue in patch #2.(Davidlohr)
>
> Li Ming (3):
> cxl/core: Fix caching dport GPF DVSEC issue
> cxl/pci: Update Port GPF timeout only when the first EP attaching
> cxl/pci: Drop the parameter is_port of cxl_gpf_get_dvsec()
>
> drivers/cxl/core/core.h | 2 +-
> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 6 +++---
> drivers/cxl/pmem.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-23 9:31 Li Ming
2025-03-23 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cxl/core: Fix caching dport GPF DVSEC issue Li Ming
2025-03-23 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cxl/pci: Update Port GPF timeout only when the first EP attaching Li Ming
2025-03-23 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cxl/pci: Drop the parameter is_port of cxl_gpf_get_dvsec() Li Ming
2025-04-09 20:32 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f066cf58-b29e-4b5c-a22a-413fd9d03edd@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®