From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FD7457C70B for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 15:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788969482; cv=none; b=sPY9B5gp4NdOXN/7VDNzjMMX8IxR10+sQgiTecaaXEFOdgzWTdvA+YwQw2T6HL18HygR/5DQ07nPHo2Ez4+RrJWs5exOrtacLGrDCVrRnX2GFcgAk8zTZQI+mdAwEl/AKcXzxslO5e7xUWSNeP3bm7T9PFfOqv67j/IVPcvxQig= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788969482; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cbDBndLD0r2payapstoz7DgAfghRCbvI5tIkdP+SShA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MDuxw0OQMRShe/sEKQ4ml3eqikYARxx8OSuJZxVVdE6ZK133U7QY4g6kfP6QtwzHjGCKtDJLpwUgZQRlg6tpkWOnwUKBsTFy0y/9Xqryb4+g8PpAqgHIW0A9U+iUKxiSKEve9lKQNq6GRmhqnrM+zsI2TZROJ7JKBZMxrPHaWQg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=N8BabzuM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="N8BabzuM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1788969481; x=1820505481; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=cbDBndLD0r2payapstoz7DgAfghRCbvI5tIkdP+SShA=; b=N8BabzuMWHm+KQkL21xijUYylik9ux4+fRc11j1MqRrF/jHFEOPfX7o1 9JV0QtlB5ZkgfIMq4bLvhcHZYpr463QuoZuVviBhQbNxrbAnzvjdRRqCj sJ7Z6p9VoEK2OUmwDoQyRxCOAuC5sJUN6MfYhtnHzrgy8nR/t7ZO91oFQ oD46K5ZFkzyN9CU9xfU4nLfsTqNfsJHDc5FLFoL/ypyrFFpKzrlXUfWdk wN0UEhMs2Le05XdIL5ot0/aEPDjI99VW59vT/lxaIxCuwgp0MAI37EuRg E7TEvbKqIHe3NPBdP97O0dWy6DvIhKnNfWV8pCjqRS3logp3QHTycR+XB w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zq9a6zt4RreYiB9vBQVMlA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bg9bAB7OTn+l8wY2iNalPg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11900"; a="89328951" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,270,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="89328951" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2026 08:57:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +E3rG8htRSigs3yfiJASpg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Mzw9OwFmSaeEBMIdxI7oug== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,270,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="301240656" Received: from fpallare-mobl4.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.20]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2026 08:57:47 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Luca Ceresoli , Maarten Lankhorst , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Jessica Zhang , Linus Walleij , Inki Dae , Jagan Teki , Marek Szyprowski , Albert Esteve , Anusha Srivatsa , Dmitry Baryshkov , Hui Pu , Ian Ray , Thomas Petazzoni , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ville =?utf-8?B?U3lyasOkbMOk?= Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 05/19] drm/panel: embed a drm_bridge into every drm_panel In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo, Finland References: <20260903-drm-bridge-every-panel-v2-0-2ab8ee24538e@bootlin.com> <20260903-drm-bridge-every-panel-v2-5-2ab8ee24538e@bootlin.com> <678ddef7e56703d9adffff5c490d4857af515343@intel.com> <3efb06a30baae6ba1bfcf2be449bf207a30f674d@intel.com> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 18:57:44 +0300 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 09 Sep 2026, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 05:02:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2026, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> > I really wish i915 was at least *trying* to fit within the larger model >> > basically everybody else uses. I understand that it's a large >> > undertaking and regression prone and everything, but I'm also concerned >> > about having the "we can't because of i915" or "supported by everybody >> > else but i915" on a regular basis now. >> >> Okay, let's hear it, please name a few things where i915 is alone in >> doing something bonkers that amd, radeon, nouveau also don't do, and >> what would be the changes that would bring i915 closer to everybody >> else? > > Where did I say "bonkers"? > > But since you're asking, because it doesn't implement .reset, we had that > conversation this week for > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260908-drm-reset-state-flag-v3-0-905570f387a4@kernel.org You mean struct drm_crtc_funcs .reset? -- Jani Nikula, Intel