mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: change RETPOLINE into CONFIG_RETPOLINE
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:17:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f09d61a6-21ff-1557-d3f7-209944a4308d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181231234253.2724-1-namit@vmware.com>


On 2019/1/1 7:42, Nadav Amit wrote:
> A recent enhancement intentionally fails the kernel build if the
> compiler does not support retpolines and CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set.
>
> However, the patch that introduced it did not change RETPOLINE macro
> references into CONFIG_RETPOLINE ones. As a result, indirect branches
> that are used by init functions are not kept (i.e., they use
> retpolines), and modules that do not use retpolines are marked as
> retpoline-safe.
>
> Fix it be changing RETPOLINE into CONFIG_RETPOLINE.
>
> Fixes: 4cd24de3a098 ("x86/retpoline: Make CONFIG_RETPOLINE depend on compiler support")
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c   | 2 +-
>   include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 +-
>   include/linux/module.h       | 2 +-
>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 8654b8b0c848..1de0f4170178 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static enum spectre_v2_mitigation spectre_v2_enabled __ro_after_init =
>   static enum spectre_v2_user_mitigation spectre_v2_user __ro_after_init =
>   	SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE;
>   
> -#ifdef RETPOLINE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
>   static bool spectre_v2_bad_module;
>   
>   bool retpoline_module_ok(bool has_retpoline)
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> index 2010493e1040..977ddf2774f9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
>    */
>   #define uninitialized_var(x) x = x
>   
> -#ifdef RETPOLINE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
>   #define __noretpoline __attribute__((__indirect_branch__("keep")))
>   #endif
>   
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index fce6b4335e36..0c575f51fe57 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static inline void module_bug_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
>   static inline void module_bug_cleanup(struct module *mod) {}
>   #endif	/* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */
>   
> -#ifdef RETPOLINE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
>   extern bool retpoline_module_ok(bool has_retpoline);
>   #else
>   static inline bool retpoline_module_ok(bool has_retpoline)

Someone sent a similar patch last month, see below link,  you missed the 
change in scripts/mod/modpost.c

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/10/540

But you patch description is more clear.

-- 
Thanks
Zhenzhong


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-02  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-31 23:42 Nadav Amit
2019-01-02  1:17 ` Zhenzhong Duan [this message]
2019-01-02 17:23   ` Nadav Amit
2019-01-03  2:07     ` Zhenzhong Duan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f09d61a6-21ff-1557-d3f7-209944a4308d@oracle.com \
    --to=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®