From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: introduce new field flags in block_device
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:45:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0ac497e-e599-4892-94f7-469660cb5f84@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231120093847.2228127-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On 11/20/23 10:38, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> There are multiple switches in struct block_device, use seperate bool
> fields for them is not gracefully. Add a new field flags and replace
> swithes to a bit, there are no functional changes, and preapre to add
> a new switch in the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> block/bdev.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> block/blk-core.c | 7 ++++---
> block/genhd.c | 8 +++++---
> block/ioctl.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/blk_types.h | 12 ++++++------
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++--
> 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c
> index fc8d28d77495..cb849bcf61ae 100644
> --- a/block/bdev.c
> +++ b/block/bdev.c
> @@ -408,10 +408,10 @@ struct block_device *bdev_alloc(struct gendisk *disk, u8 partno)
> bdev->bd_partno = partno;
> bdev->bd_inode = inode;
> bdev->bd_queue = disk->queue;
> - if (partno)
> - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio;
> + if (partno && test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags))
> + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags);
> else
> - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = false;
> + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags);
> bdev->bd_stats = alloc_percpu(struct disk_stats);
> if (!bdev->bd_stats) {
> iput(inode);
Couldn't you achieve the very same result by using
'READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()' and keep the structure as-is?
Cheers,
Hannes--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
Managing Directors: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-20 9:38 [PATCH 0/2] block: warn once for each partition in bio_check_ro() Yu Kuai
2023-11-20 9:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: introduce new field flags in block_device Yu Kuai
2023-11-20 3:00 ` Ming Lei
2023-11-20 6:37 ` Yu Kuai
2023-11-20 6:58 ` Ming Lei
2023-11-20 7:14 ` Yu Kuai
2023-11-20 8:01 ` Yu Kuai
2023-11-20 12:39 ` Ming Lei
2023-11-20 10:45 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-11-20 13:24 ` Yu Kuai
2023-11-20 9:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: warn once for each partition in bio_check_ro() Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0ac497e-e599-4892-94f7-469660cb5f84@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®