Re: [PATCH v3 50/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Update drivers/hwmon/peci/cputemp.c

["Winiarska, Iwona" <iwona.winiarska@intel.com>]

On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 06:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 01:32:15PM +0000, Winiarska, Iwona wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-04-16 at 23:57 +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > > If the CPU defines and the new macro are to be kept in architecture
> > > > code,
> > > > maybe include arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h from
> > > > linux/peci.cpu.h.
> > > > That would not be worse than today's include of intel-family.h.
> > > 
> > > Guenter,
> > > 
> > > Looks like I did that to resolve one of the other peci problems. Because I
> > > already have:
> > > 
> > > #include "../../arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h"
> > > #include "../../arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h"
> > > 
> > > in <linux/peci_cpu.h>
> > > 
> > > Simply deleting the include from cputemp.c builds OK in the
> > > context of all the other changes in my patch series.
> > 
> > Hi Tony,
> > 
> > It won't build on non-x86, as cpu_device_id.h includes <asm/intel-family.h>.
> > I think the simplest way to solve the issue is to provide a copy of VFM_*
> > macros
> > and X86_VENDOR_INTEL in include/linux/peci-cpu.h.
> > 
> 
> I think the proper fix would really be to move the include files to a
> generic directory, such as include/linux/x86/ or include/linux/cpu/x86/.
> After all, they _are_ now needed in non-Intel code.

Yeah, that was the initial proposal:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210803113134.2262882-2-iwona.winiarska@intel.com/

Unfortunately, it ended up being simplified to just include arch/x86 directly.

-Iwona

> 
> Guenter