From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] optimise registered buffer/file updates
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 17:21:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0dfaa17-fc0e-459e-41ea-8131d558fddb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6u111te.fsf@suse.de>
On 3/31/23 14:35, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> writes:
>> Updating registered files and buffers is a very slow operation, which
>> makes it not feasible for workloads with medium update frequencies.
>> Rework the underlying rsrc infra for greater performance and lesser
>> memory footprint.
>>
>> The improvement is ~11x for a benchmark updating files in a loop
>> (1040K -> 11468K updates / sec).
>
> Nice. That's a really impressive improvement.
>
> I've been adding io_uring test cases for automated performance
> regression testing with mmtests (open source). I'd love to take a look
> at this test case and adapt it to mmtests, so we can pick it up and run
> it frequently.
>
> is it something you can share?
I'll post it later.
The test is quite stupid and with the patches less than 10% of CPU
cycles go to the update machinery (against 90+ w/o), the rest is spend
for syscalling, submitting update requests, etc., so it almost hits the
limit.
Another test we can do is to measure latency b/w the point we asked a
rsrc to be removed and when it actually got destroyed/freed, e.g. tags
will help with that. It should've been improved nicely as well as it
removes the RCU grace period and other bouncing.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-31 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 14:53 Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] io_uring/rsrc: use non-pcpu refcounts for nodes Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 02/11] io_uring/rsrc: keep cached refs per node Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 03/11] io_uring: don't put nodes under spinlocks Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 04/11] io_uring: io_free_req() via tw Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 05/11] io_uring/rsrc: protect node refs with uring_lock Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 06/11] io_uring/rsrc: kill rsrc_ref_lock Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 07/11] io_uring/rsrc: rename rsrc_list Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 08/11] io_uring/rsrc: optimise io_rsrc_put allocation Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 09/11] io_uring/rsrc: don't offload node free Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 10/11] io_uring/rsrc: cache struct io_rsrc_node Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-31 14:09 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-03-31 16:27 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-01 0:04 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-04-04 13:21 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-04-04 15:48 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-04-04 15:52 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-04 16:53 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-04-04 18:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-30 14:53 ` [PATCH 11/11] io_uring/rsrc: add lockdep sanity checks Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-31 13:35 ` [RFC 00/11] optimise registered buffer/file updates Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-03-31 16:21 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-03-31 15:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f0dfaa17-fc0e-459e-41ea-8131d558fddb@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krisman@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®