mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: colyli@suse.de, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mchristi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: dont reset bio opf in bch_data_insert_start
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:45:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0e5dd5e-79a0-5757-1f0a-692f7542754f@easystack.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e360e24b-7c6e-f7b3-ee59-e4f9d7dd3576@easystack.cn>

Hi Christoph,

在 2021/1/28 星期四 下午 5:10, Dongsheng Yang 写道:
> Hi Christop:
> 
> 在 2021/1/28 星期四 上午 1:37, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
>> But the old code is also completely broken.  We can't just OR in
>> the op, as that implicitly assumes the old op was 0 (REQ_OP_READ).
> 
> 
> Yes, indeed, there is an assume that the op is just possible to be 0 
> (REQ_OP_READ) or 1 (REQ_OP_WRITE).
> 
> REQ_OP_WRITE is from cached_dev_submit_bio() which would be submitted by 
> upper user.
> 
> REQ_OP_READ is from bcache itself, such as cached_dev_read_done() (when 
> we found cache miss, we will read
> 
> data from backing and then we want to insert it into cache device. then 
> there is a read bio with data reach here, we
> 
> need to set the bio_op to REQ_OP_WRITE, and send this bio to cache device).
> 
>> Please fix this to explicitly set the exact op and flags that you want
>> instead of this fragile magic.blk_rq_map_kern
> 
> This commit only want to fix the logic bug introduced in ad0d9e76a412 
> ("bcache: use bio op accessors"),
> 
> that's more likely a partial revert.
> 
> 
> I agree that we can make it more clearly and explicitly.
> 
> But I found there is no accessor to set op only, besides, the 
> bio_set_op_attrs() was marked as obsolete.
> 
> There are some others doing similar things as below:
> 
> blk_rq_map_kern():
> 
> bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_OP_MASK;
> 
> bio->bi_opf |= req_op(rq);
> 
> 
> So what about below:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index c7cadaafa947..bacc7366002f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -244,7 +244,14 @@ static void bch_data_insert_start(struct closure *cl)
>                  trace_bcache_cache_insert(k);
>                  bch_keylist_push(&op->insert_keys);
> 
> -               bio_set_op_attrs(n, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
> +               /*
> +                * n here would be REQ_OP_READ, if
> +                * we are inserting data read from
> +                * backing device in cache miss or
> +                * inserting data in movinggc.
> +                */
> +               n->bi_opf &= ~REQ_OP_MASK;
> +               n->bi_opf |= REQ_OP_WRITE;
>                  bch_submit_bbio(n, op->c, k, 0);
>          } while (n != bio);

Another solution is introducing an accessor to set op only, something 
like bio_set_op(). Then we should keep the bcache patch as what it was 
to fix the bug.

And send another patch to introduce bio_set_op():

diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index 6e804892d5ec..83bc33a59fa5 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -587,9 +587,7 @@ static int __blk_rq_map_user_iov(struct request *rq,
         if (IS_ERR(bio))
                 return PTR_ERR(bio);

-       bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_OP_MASK;
-       bio->bi_opf |= req_op(rq);
-
+       bio_set_op(bio, req_op(rq));
         orig_bio = bio;

         /*
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index eb734f7ddaac..d8839300805e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -244,7 +244,13 @@ static void bch_data_insert_start(struct closure *cl)
                 trace_bcache_cache_insert(k);
                 bch_keylist_push(&op->insert_keys);

-               n->bi_opf |= REQ_OP_WRITE;
+               /*
+                * n here would be REQ_OP_READ, if
+                * we are inserting data read from
+                * backing device in cache miss or
+                * inserting data in movinggc.
+                */
+               bio_set_op(n, REQ_OP_WRITE);
                 bch_submit_bbio(n, op->c, k, 0);
         } while (n != bio);

diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index b3fc5d3dd8ea..2affd3269bdc 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -439,6 +439,12 @@ static inline void bio_set_op_attrs(struct bio 
*bio, unsigned op,
         bio->bi_opf = op | op_flags;
  }

+static inline void bio_set_op(struct bio *bio, unsigned op)
+{
+       bio->bi_opf &= ~REQ_OP_MASK;
+       bio->bi_opf |= op;
+}
+
  static inline bool op_is_write(unsigned int op)
  {
         return (op & 1);

> 
> 
> Thanx
> 
> Yang
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-28 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-25  4:29 Dongsheng Yang
2021-01-25  4:53 ` Coly Li
2021-01-26  4:32   ` Dongsheng Yang
2021-01-26  4:34     ` Coly Li
2021-01-26  4:41       ` Dongsheng Yang
2021-01-27 17:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28  9:10   ` Dongsheng Yang
2021-01-28 10:45     ` Dongsheng Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0e5dd5e-79a0-5757-1f0a-692f7542754f@easystack.cn \
    --to=dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®