From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>, <tj@kernel.org>,
<wangyijing@huawei.com>, Heyousong <heyousong@huawei.com>,
"chenqilin (C)" <chenqilin2@huawei.com>,
"chenqilin (C)" <chenqilin2@huawei.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Re-order scsi_remove_host and sas_remove_host in SAS HBA LLDDs
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:34:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f101e42e-0aed-b8ce-2f36-cf16d1964f46@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1492760075.git.jthumshirn@suse.de>
Thanks Johannes.
@wangyijing, can you test this patchset please (specifically 3/5)? I
know that you have the modified version of libsas which you dabbled with
upstreaming.
On 21/04/2017 09:04, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> This series re-orders the calls to scsi_remove_host() and sas_remove_host() in
> all SAS HBA drivers (apart from mpt3sas which is doing it correctly). This is
> for two reasons:
> 1) After the change to recursive removal of sysfs entries, we're
> trying to remove already removed kobjects when doing a
> sas_remove_host() _after_ a scsi_remove_host()
> 2) the documentation mandates it even (becuase of 1)
>
> Unfortunately this does not completely solve issues with recursive sysfs
> removals in SAS, as libsas has asynchronous behaviour where strong ordering
> would be needed. But I am working on it and I do know other do as well. So if
> anyone else (James, Christoph, Bart, I'm looking at you) has an idea, I do
> have test setups and I'm willing to take input in form of ideas and patches.
>
wangyijing already sent an RFC for fixing this issue (mentioned above),
which was a signifiagnt rewrite of some of libsas.
I am hoping that he would retry, and that community would
support/shepherd this activity, or at least say it will be accepted so
effort is not wasted.
> I also dropped the SDEV_CANCEL state change for now. We re-evaluate it once we
> have an idea how to tackle the ordering issues and place it into
> sas_unregister_ha() as per James' comment.
>
> Thanks,
> Johannes
Thanks
>
> Johannes Thumshirn (5):
> scsi: isci: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
> aic94xx: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
> scsi: hisi_sas: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
> mvsas: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
> scsi: pm8001: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host
>
> drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c | 7 ++++---
> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/scsi/isci/init.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_init.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 8 ++++++--
> 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-21 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-21 8:04 Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-21 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: isci: remove the SAS host after the SCSI host Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-21 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] aic94xx: " Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-21 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: hisi_sas: " Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-21 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mvsas: " Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-21 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: pm8001: " Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-21 8:34 ` John Garry [this message]
2017-04-21 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Re-order scsi_remove_host and sas_remove_host in SAS HBA LLDDs Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-21 8:57 ` John Garry
2017-04-21 11:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-21 11:54 ` John Garry
2017-04-22 0:29 ` wangyijing
2017-04-21 11:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-21 11:22 ` Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f101e42e-0aed-b8ce-2f36-cf16d1964f46@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=chenqilin2@huawei.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heyousong@huawei.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome