mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Moon <quic_johmoo@quicinc.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	"Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
	<linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@quicinc.com>,
	"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
	"Matthias Maennich" <maennich@google.com>,
	Giuliano Procida <gprocida@google.com>, <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Jordan Crouse <jorcrous@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] check-uapi: Introduce check-uapi.sh
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:33:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f10b5d1f-4260-2b20-107a-9dbb8bc0e65f@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/CJhzSJ5YKvD7my@kroah.com>

On 2/18/2023 12:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:22:34PM -0800, John Moon wrote:
>> While the kernel community has been good at maintaining backwards
>> compatibility with kernel UAPIs, it would be helpful to have a tool
>> to check if a patch introduces changes that break backwards
>> compatibility.
>>
>> To that end, introduce check-uapi.sh: a simple shell script that
>> checks for changes to UAPI headers using libabigail.
>>
>> libabigail is "a framework which aims at helping developers and
>> software distributors to spot some ABI-related issues like interface
>> incompatibility in ELF shared libraries by performing a static
>> analysis of the ELF binaries at hand."
>>
>> The script uses one of libabigail's tools, "abidiff", to compile the
>> changed header before and after the patch to detect any changes.
>>
>> abidiff "compares the ABI of two shared libraries in ELF format. It
>> emits a meaningful report describing the differences between the two
>> ABIs."
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Moon <quic_johmoo@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   scripts/check-uapi.sh | 245 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 245 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100755 scripts/check-uapi.sh
> 
> Ok, this is very cool, thank you so much for doing this.
> 
> I know Randy Dunlap was also looking into this previously, so I've cc:ed
> him and bounced him the original.
> 

Okay, will keep him in the loop!

> I tried this out, and at first glance, this felt like it was just "too
> fast" in that nothing actually was being tested.  So I manually added a
> field to a structure I know would break the abi, and:
> 
> 	$ ./scripts/check-uapi.sh
> 	!!! ABI differences detected in include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h (compared to file at HEAD^1) !!!
> 
> 	    [C] 'struct usb_ctrlrequest' changed:
> 	      type size changed from 64 to 72 (in bits)
> 	      1 data member insertion:
> 		'__u8 abi_break', at offset 16 (in bits) at ch9.h:216:1
> 	      3 data member changes:
> 		'__le16 wValue' offset changed from 16 to 24 (in bits) (by +8 bits)
> 		'__le16 wIndex' offset changed from 32 to 40 (in bits) (by +8 bits)
> 		'__le16 wLength' offset changed from 48 to 56 (in bits) (by +8 bits)
> 
> 	0/1 UAPI header file changes are backwards compatible
> 	UAPI header ABI check failed
> 
> So it worked!
> 
> There is a mismatch of different bash coding styles in the document, which
> isn't a big deal, and one warning produced by the `shellcheck` tool, but that
> can all be fixed up later.  I'll go queue this up now, as a starting point for
> people to play with, thanks!
> 

Will resolve all shellcheck warnings in next rev. Not sure about the 
coding style differences you're referring to - is there a shell script 
coding style document?

> Also, it would be nice to be able to check if the current tree with changes in
> it (not checked in, just modified) breaks the abi, without having to go and
> check the change in.  But again, future fixups for people to do!
> 

Should be straightforward to add. Since I'm making another rev, I'll 
take care of this as well.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-22 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-17 20:22 [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Validating UAPI backwards compatibility John Moon
2023-02-17 20:22 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/1] check-uapi: Introduce check-uapi.sh John Moon
2023-02-18  8:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-18  8:31     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-18 18:22       ` Trilok Soni
2023-02-19  8:52       ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-02-22 20:36         ` John Moon
2023-02-22 20:33     ` John Moon [this message]
2023-02-19  5:25   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-02-22 20:38     ` John Moon
2023-02-19  9:36   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-02-22 21:06     ` John Moon
2023-02-19  9:47 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Validating UAPI backwards compatibility Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f10b5d1f-4260-2b20-107a-9dbb8bc0e65f@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_johmoo@quicinc.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=gprocida@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jorcrous@amazon.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maennich@google.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
    --cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®