Re: [PATCH] mailbox: bcm-flexrm-mailbox: Fix FlexRM ring flush timeout issue

[Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>]

On 1/3/2019 7:50 PM, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
> RING_CONTROL reg was not written due to wrong address, hence all
> the subsequent ring flush was timing out.
> 
> Fixes: a371c10ea4b3 ("mailbox: bcm-flexrm-mailbox: Fix FlexRM ring flush sequence")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com>
> Tested-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c
> index d7a8ed7..57cd729 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/bcm-flexrm-mailbox.c
> @@ -1396,9 +1396,9 @@ static void flexrm_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>  
>  	/* Clear ring flush state */
>  	timeout = 1000; /* timeout of 1s */
> -	writel_relaxed(0x0, ring + RING_CONTROL);
> +	writel_relaxed(0x0, ring->regs + RING_CONTROL);
>  	do {
> -		if (!(readl_relaxed(ring + RING_FLUSH_DONE) &
> +		if (!(readl_relaxed(ring->regs + RING_FLUSH_DONE) &
>  		      FLUSH_DONE_MASK))
>  			break;
>  		mdelay(1);
> 

Looks good to me. Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>