From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755228AbeARIyM (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 03:54:12 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51978 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755250AbeARIyK (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 03:54:10 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqdomain: provide useful debugging information for irq domain To: "Yang, Shunyong" , "tglx@linutronix.de" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Zheng, Joey" References: <1516163877-32396-1-git-send-email-shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com> <210f90d0-1588-2185-4845-d5d143183621@arm.com> <1516181177.3280.13.camel@hxt-semitech.com> <1516182426.3280.19.camel@hxt-semitech.com> <1516184428.3280.25.camel@hxt-semitech.com> <1516240404.15644.23.camel@hxt-semitech.com> From: Marc Zyngier Organization: ARM Ltd Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:54:07 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1516240404.15644.23.camel@hxt-semitech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/01/18 01:53, Yang, Shunyong wrote: > Hi, Marc > > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:43 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 17/01/18 10:20, Yang, Shunyong wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Thomas and Marc, >>> >>> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 11:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Yang, Shunyong wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 10:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And how is that different from: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The nodes under debugfs irq/irqs describes information of >>>>>>> every >>>>>>> single >>>>>>> irq. >>>>>> Not at all. It contains the complete hierarchical information >>>>>> of >>>>>> each >>>>>> virq. >>>>>> >>>>> I think irq_domain_mapping can provide some high-level >>>>> information >>>>> in a >>>>> summary style. >>>>> For example, we can check all the IRQs connect to a specific >>>>> irq >>>>> chip >>>>> or irq domain. >>>> You can retrieve the same information from the irq/irqs files. >>>> All it >>>> takes >>>> is a shell script. >>>> >>>> Aside of that with hierarchical irq domains the old debug output >>>> is >>>> just >>>> useless. >>>> >>> Umm...Agree. Need I post a patch to remove it? >> I'm on it. >> > In addition to the "%p" to "%px" change in IRQ_DOMAIN_DEBUG you have > posted patch to remove it, my original patch includes several other > changes: > 1. change to "%px" in kasprintf() parameters in > function __irq_domain_alloc_fwnode() to build name which reflects the > real pointer address from caller, this may be useful when reading debug > information. >   > n = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "irqchip@%px", data); Have you investigated whether %pK would work in a debug context? > > 2. other 3 changes from "%p" to "%px" in existing pr_debug(). > > Could I submit a V2 patch which depends on your "irqdomain: Kill > CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_DEBUG" patch to handle this?  > Following is the link of your patch, > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10169367/  Sure. If you think something is missing, feel free to send an additional patch. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...