From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>, Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, <axboe@fb.com>,
<linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: Re: linux-next memleak after IO on dax mountpoint
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:48:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1595b85-8fdc-fc8a-4ac5-e379837d61d9@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHse=S-H_yMhZKNmMZpb41M+o+2tMRyxiUG9wQoemewBXXYTPw@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/02/2016 08:22 AM, David Drysdale wrote:
> FWIW, I'm also seeing kmemleak report a leak with v4.7-rc1, in
> a different scenario (just normal desktop use). Not done much
> digging so far, but this commit (9082e87bf) looks like it might be
> relevant -- lots of the following:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff8800c288e900 (size 256):
> comm "dconf-service", pid 1461, jiffies 4294895636 (age 48.028s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0 a4 c0 c6 00 88 ff ff ................
> 02 20 00 20 00 00 00 00 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 . . ............
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff81955228>] kmemleak_alloc+0x28/0x50
> [<ffffffff81268bdc>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xfc/0x360
> [<ffffffff81203275>] mempool_alloc_slab+0x15/0x20
> [<ffffffff812030de>] mempool_alloc+0x6e/0x170
> [<ffffffff815014e8>] bio_alloc_bioset+0xb8/0x230
> [<ffffffff81514174>] next_bio+0x24/0x50
> [<ffffffff815145ef>] blkdev_issue_zeroout+0xdf/0x1d0
> [<ffffffff8132ce79>] ext4_issue_zeroout+0x39/0x50
> [<ffffffff81357abf>] ext4_ext_zeroout+0x2f/0x40
> [<ffffffff8135ece0>] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1870/0x2190
> [<ffffffff8132cfa1>] ext4_map_blocks+0x111/0x620
> [<ffffffff81330dc8>] ext4_writepages+0x7c8/0x10a0
> [<ffffffff81211851>] do_writepages+0x21/0x30
> [<ffffffff812012ba>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xaa/0xf0
> [<ffffffff812013fd>] filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x2d/0x70
> [<ffffffff81326f6d>] ext4_sync_file+0x18d/0x500
(+Christoph)
With kernel v4.7-rc1 and XFS I see that the blkdev_issue_zeroout() calls
triggered by xfstests make kmemleak complain. I hadn't seen this with
any previous kernel version.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-03 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-27 8:46 Xiong Zhou
2016-05-28 4:05 ` Xiong Zhou
2016-06-01 14:37 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-06-02 2:20 ` Xiong Zhou
2016-06-02 15:22 ` David Drysdale
2016-06-03 6:35 ` linux-next/linux " Xiong Zhou
2016-06-03 16:48 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2016-06-07 10:26 ` Xiong Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1595b85-8fdc-fc8a-4ac5-e379837d61d9@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=drysdale@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=xzhou@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®