From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Julian Vetter' <jvetter@kalrayinc.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, "Guo Ren" <guoren@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" <linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] Consolidate __memcpy_{to,from}io and __memset_io into iomap_copy.c
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:37:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1673602e3f246cf92f3453f0c13911b@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240925132420.821473-2-jvetter@kalrayinc.com>
From: Julian Vetter
> Sent: 25 September 2024 14:24
>
> Various architectures have almost the same implementations for
> __memcpy_{to,from}io and __memset_io functions. So, consolidate them
> into the existing lib/iomap_copy.c.
>
> Reviewed-by: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Vetter <jvetter@kalrayinc.com>
> ---
> Signed-off-by: Julian Vetter <jvetter@kalrayinc.com>
> ---
> Changes for v6:
> - Included linux/aslign.h
> - Replaced compile time check by ifdef to remove compiler warning
> ---
> include/asm-generic/io.h | 12 +++++
> lib/iomap_copy.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> index 80de699bf6af..9b8e0449da28 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> @@ -102,6 +102,18 @@ static inline void log_post_read_mmio(u64 val, u8 width, const volatile void __i
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_MMIO_ACCESS */
>
> +#ifndef __memcpy_fromio
> +void __memcpy_fromio(void *to, const volatile void __iomem *from, size_t count);
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef __memcpy_toio
> +void __memcpy_toio(volatile void __iomem *to, const void *from, size_t count);
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef __memset_io
> +void __memset_io(volatile void __iomem *dst, int c, size_t count);
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * __raw_{read,write}{b,w,l,q}() access memory in native endianness.
> *
> diff --git a/lib/iomap_copy.c b/lib/iomap_copy.c
> index 2fd5712fb7c0..c2cee6410151 100644
> --- a/lib/iomap_copy.c
> +++ b/lib/iomap_copy.c
> @@ -3,9 +3,15 @@
> * Copyright 2006 PathScale, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> */
>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/align.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
>
> +#define NATIVE_STORE_SIZE (BITS_PER_LONG/8)
(sizeof (long))
> +
> /**
> * __iowrite32_copy - copy data to MMIO space, in 32-bit units
> * @to: destination, in MMIO space (must be 32-bit aligned)
> @@ -76,3 +82,106 @@ void __iowrite64_copy(void __iomem *to, const void *from, size_t count)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__iowrite64_copy);
> #endif
> +
> +
> +#ifndef __memcpy_fromio
> +void __memcpy_fromio(void *to, const volatile void __iomem *from, size_t count)
> +{
> + while (count && !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)from, NATIVE_STORE_SIZE)) {
> + *(u8 *)to = __raw_readb(from);
> + from++;
> + to++;
> + count--;
> + }
> +
> + while (count >= NATIVE_STORE_SIZE) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + put_unaligned(__raw_readq(from), (uintptr_t *)to);
> +#else
> + put_unaligned(__raw_readl(from), (uintptr_t *)to);
> +#endif
That looks horrid to me.
You seem to be mixing several different types and tests.
NATIVE_STORE_SIZE is based on the 'long ' type (indirectly and by assumption).
CONFIG_64BiIT (probably) implies LP64.
readl() reads 4 bytes and readq() 8 (for both 32bit and 64bit kernels)
uintptr is an unsigned integer large enough to hold a pointer.
The sizes might all happen to match, but there is no need to rely on all of them.
I might be best to just use 'sizeof (long)' except that you might
get a compile error on some 32bit archs for the:
long val = sizeof (val) == 8) ? readq(from) : readl(from);
put_unaligned(val, (long *)to);
(due to there being no declaration readq())
so it might need a #if somewhere.
OTOH there might always be an 'extern' for readq().
If you are using the __raw_readx() functions don't you need the
synchronisation barriers top and bottom?
Also if put_unaligned() is non-trivial the code will be horrid.
An initial test for ((to | from) & (sizeof (long) - 1) == 0) for an
aligned copy may be worthwhile.
There is the question of whether the code is allowed to do full
word reads - valid if the io area behaves like memory.
In which case you don't want to do byte transfers for alignment
and tail transfers - just read the full word that contains the data.
PCIe reads can be horribly slow (writes are 'posted' so much better).
I'm not sure how long they take into a 'normal' target, but back to
back reads into our fpga are about 128 clocks apart on its internal
125Mhz clock - the host cpu will stall for the entire period.
So you definitely want to use the largest register possible.
(Or try very hard to never do non-dma reads in either direction.)
David
> +
> + from += NATIVE_STORE_SIZE;
> + to += NATIVE_STORE_SIZE;
> + count -= NATIVE_STORE_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + while (count) {
> + *(u8 *)to = __raw_readb(from);
> + from++;
> + to++;
> + count--;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcpy_fromio);
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef __memcpy_toio
> +void __memcpy_toio(volatile void __iomem *to, const void *from, size_t count)
> +{
> + while (count && !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)to, NATIVE_STORE_SIZE)) {
> + __raw_writeb(*(u8 *)from, to);
> + from++;
> + to++;
> + count--;
> + }
> +
> + while (count >= NATIVE_STORE_SIZE) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + __raw_writeq(get_unaligned((uintptr_t *)from), to);
> +#else
> + __raw_writel(get_unaligned((uintptr_t *)from), to);
> +#endif
> +
> + from += NATIVE_STORE_SIZE;
> + to += NATIVE_STORE_SIZE;
> + count -= NATIVE_STORE_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + while (count) {
> + __raw_writeb(*(u8 *)from, to);
> + from++;
> + to++;
> + count--;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcpy_toio);
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef __memset_io
> +void __memset_io(volatile void __iomem *dst, int c, size_t count)
> +{
> + uintptr_t qc = (u8)c;
> +
> + qc |= qc << 8;
> + qc |= qc << 16;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + qc |= qc << 32;
> +#endif
> +
> + while (count && !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)dst, NATIVE_STORE_SIZE)) {
> + __raw_writeb(c, dst);
> + dst++;
> + count--;
> + }
> +
> + while (count >= NATIVE_STORE_SIZE) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + __raw_writeq(qc, dst);
> +#else
> + __raw_writel(qc, dst);
> +#endif
> +
> + dst += NATIVE_STORE_SIZE;
> + count -= NATIVE_STORE_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + while (count) {
> + __raw_writeb(c, dst);
> + dst++;
> + count--;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memset_io);
> +#endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>
>
>
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-29 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-25 13:24 [PATCH v6 0/5] Consolidate IO memcpy functions Julian Vetter
2024-09-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] Consolidate __memcpy_{to,from}io and __memset_io into iomap_copy.c Julian Vetter
2024-09-26 7:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-09-27 8:19 ` Julian Vetter
2024-09-27 10:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-09-29 20:37 ` David Laight [this message]
2024-09-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] Replace generic memcpy and memset by IO memcpy functions Julian Vetter
2024-09-27 5:28 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-27 5:49 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] arm64: Use generic io " Julian Vetter
2024-09-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] csky: " Julian Vetter
2024-09-26 3:22 ` Guo Ren
2024-09-25 13:24 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] loongarch: " Julian Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1673602e3f246cf92f3453f0c13911b@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=jvetter@kalrayinc.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ysionneau@kalrayinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®