From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net (003.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D021898F2; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 19:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759347853; cv=none; b=Aa3UOaltZUi7EkPyRhGpZgykn0zkrYNrG+bakfLlRZP1+RMEGR/ty/7mDh4s2Iiw+ajiXrUN+JtlnsdgXh8RGQl6L241ZtGNrCvRfuOchadMCYfuKwa7FteaQeakL37MRE+PzTimaQAr4bMiu0Dyrc4vZpO3ug3qHxCQ3aabyDA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759347853; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sZC9Cc5qimBHaJMXkgIGAMY0M5BLPARika85afPbJpQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=lpTeGn+r0w5N7VXbpPjKddTR7vafx+xxSGRIbH6oyzsZXZOzf9S2mu9fjN9F/4vop13M7Ytzdz6jIwiT9Jfaack9aiTkXzRtBhkx1mmvkmwDq11nU6qhA388MynyY6h3wEKEz72qtq8nOpDk/qeO8FXLgmWMixlhSZF1l+DN5SA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=K75bn2d0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="K75bn2d0" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ccQNP3d0fzltJQn; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 19:44:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1759347843; x=1761939844; bh=sZC9Cc5qimBHaJMXkgIGAMY0 M5BLPARika85afPbJpQ=; b=K75bn2d0qFfR2XlspY2sw+RRqlRSYl9K/7RfKmgu nhxsjmgQIn9VcZAc4QyFGE4wf6vvJnBXyLTPo69DJ6hClBfQmFyDsdth+KUvNhpg sz67ZKgW3L9PyIxnGdC5NAnJrnkPj7J0h2Rd9C2H3qqX3tWO47NQB+86HrcXINn6 WrQWdCAVybUAEmpLdJ63vsPIpuq5r6DBInRfnn3qAYFMJD683iwkGb3x0+92U5iu nCpEG9bi2LVi1q2cad6LoqfevxudWNonvd/IDwmXeFRDqjfNKA4+wGQijPmIzs6y AytfUnRemBhPKSBmBbsni5LlNsrEruvG/Q7pGLZituHb6w== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 003.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (003.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id xj_rEbvumcNI; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 19:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.119.48.131] (unknown [104.135.180.219]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 003.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ccQND0PsXzlh0dl; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 19:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:43:53 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rpmb: move rpmb_frame struct and constants to common header To: Bean Huo , avri.altman@wdc.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, beanhuo@micron.com, jens.wiklander@linaro.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20251001060805.26462-1-beanhuo@iokpp.de> <20251001060805.26462-2-beanhuo@iokpp.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20251001060805.26462-2-beanhuo@iokpp.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/30/25 11:08 PM, Bean Huo wrote: > Move struct rpmb_frame and RPMB operation constants from MMC block > driver to include/linux/rpmb.h for reuse across different RPMB > implementations (UFS, NVMe, etc.). Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche