mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	aboorvad@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, frederic@kernel.org, joelagnelf@nvidia.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, srikar@linux.ibm.com, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, urezki@gmail.com, samir@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] cpuhp: Expedite RCU when toggling system-wide SMT mode
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:05:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1a04d2f-367e-4be8-b313-31a73e15bcd0@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615042514.694993-4-vishalc@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 09:55:16AM +0530, Vishal Chourasia wrote:
> On large idle systems, changing system-wide SMT level using the sysfs
> control interface still takes approximately 40-55 minutes. Changing SMT
> levels is an user triggered operation generally done when systems are
> fairly idle. This causes users to be blocked from doing other subsequent
> work.
> 
> Analyzing the collected profile data during SMT level switch, showed
> that CPU hotplug machinery was blocked on synchronize_rcu() calls.
> 
> Expedite RCU grace periods for the entire duration of triggered SMT
> switch operation via the sysfs control interface. Individual CPU hotplug
> operations via the online/offline interface are not affected.
> 
> On a PPC64 system with 400 CPUs:
> 
>   SMT8 to SMT1:
>     before:  1m14s
>     after:   3.2s   (~23x faster)
> 
>   SMT1 to SMT8:
>     before:  2m27s
>     after:   2.5s   (~58x faster)
> 
> On a large config system with 1920 CPUs, completion time improves from
> ~1 hour to 5-6 minutes.
> 
> Tested-by: Samir <samir@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@linux.ibm.com>

From an RCU viewpoint:

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

I am guessing that you will be taking this up some other path, but if
you would like it to to via RCU, please let me know.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h | 8 ++++++++
>  kernel/cpu.c             | 4 ++++
>  kernel/rcu/rcu.h         | 4 ----
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index bfa765132de8..b6bccf131f1c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -1178,6 +1178,14 @@ rcu_head_after_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t f)
>  extern int rcu_expedited;
>  extern int rcu_normal;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
> +static inline void rcu_expedite_gp(void) { }
> +static inline void rcu_unexpedite_gp(void) { }
> +#else
> +void rcu_expedite_gp(void);
> +void rcu_unexpedite_gp(void);
> +#endif
> +
>  DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(rcu, rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_unlock())
>  DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_0_ATTRS(rcu, __acquires_shared(RCU), __releases_shared(RCU))
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index bc4f7a9ba64e..6351da9dffdc 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -2658,6 +2658,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
>  	int cpu, ret = 0;
>  
>  	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> +	rcu_expedite_gp();
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>  		if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
>  			continue;
> @@ -2687,6 +2688,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
>  	}
>  	if (!ret)
>  		cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
> +	rcu_unexpedite_gp();
>  	cpu_maps_update_done();
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2704,6 +2706,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
>  	int cpu, ret = 0;
>  
>  	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> +	rcu_expedite_gp();
>  	cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
>  	for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>  		/* Skip online CPUs and CPUs on offline nodes */
> @@ -2717,6 +2720,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
>  		/* See comment in cpuhp_smt_disable() */
>  		cpuhp_online_cpu_device(cpu);
>  	}
> +	rcu_unexpedite_gp();
>  	cpu_maps_update_done();
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> index fa6d30ce73d1..d6a63ee60bc0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> @@ -521,8 +521,6 @@ do {									\
>  static inline bool rcu_gp_is_normal(void) { return true; }
>  static inline bool rcu_gp_is_expedited(void) { return false; }
>  static inline bool rcu_async_should_hurry(void) { return false; }
> -static inline void rcu_expedite_gp(void) { }
> -static inline void rcu_unexpedite_gp(void) { }
>  static inline void rcu_async_hurry(void) { }
>  static inline void rcu_async_relax(void) { }
>  static inline bool rcu_cpu_online(int cpu) { return true; }
> @@ -530,8 +528,6 @@ static inline bool rcu_cpu_online(int cpu) { return true; }
>  bool rcu_gp_is_normal(void);     /* Internal RCU use. */
>  bool rcu_gp_is_expedited(void);  /* Internal RCU use. */
>  bool rcu_async_should_hurry(void);  /* Internal RCU use. */
> -void rcu_expedite_gp(void);
> -void rcu_unexpedite_gp(void);
>  void rcu_async_hurry(void);
>  void rcu_async_relax(void);
>  void rcupdate_announce_bootup_oddness(void);
> -- 
> 2.54.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-15  4:25 [PATCH v5 0/1] " Vishal Chourasia
2026-06-15  4:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] " Vishal Chourasia
2026-06-15 15:05   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2026-06-16  6:09     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-21  4:31       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-29 14:53         ` Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f1a04d2f-367e-4be8-b313-31a73e15bcd0@paulmck-laptop \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=samir@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vishalc@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®