From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C38C4167B for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233483AbiL1PD6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2022 10:03:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51562 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233466AbiL1PDw (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2022 10:03:52 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 079DFE7D for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 07:03:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id e13so14189979ljn.0 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 07:03:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SAbzxvN7k7Z+MqJtpUCy5OzE3SxNhCKQRAfcgxSuip4=; b=fve/cbRfJt92/4S525YpOouK05jLG+FBs3Y6nuxqrBIKoi8ogCwVwpk3nFXM7zF0T+ YxTOD1O6syEva8FXpmEJ3KnlqAOqODDxgC7YGlqdwGL3W9pRMvhym7uIQC2BvNYegyJZ 81PDtib/pENDFyxS9G9VoIKANxeoi8xlLIgA6TJcosWu3PPhUpAlviIVITM0h/NDdC+c cXLqPG6EchvCnJZ54toDlhivhf+Nu4wS+BXQgwQMKJBBlbeF8ezKhUNJijynx7bpUhHD KQMA4Mj9yElhH/BTHyhJNidDs1ZMKwdNQ0VjQUZx1C/RrjBAzcnCjt5KrAcaYlCnVbQ1 2Y7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SAbzxvN7k7Z+MqJtpUCy5OzE3SxNhCKQRAfcgxSuip4=; b=YWpfcxEoGSuBESDaAouNSh9QnpdhmWo4dIe6dXdhRSPP+dNiYv5iU8pdtUY5/d1MnI sCEKg8ZLpKKhco2xSZ99+gC85F6K44sJYQ+p3D5EUKIxvNfjV4365IMZSTyrboflP7Pi 7AgopRJrFH0kuSFuhJWBoqISkDtpjpXS6L3faITov8YpbU+wChBLK9p2aNptUTVfMNDb Xo34zmwhkCaCbL9QegP/qUqAHeatfDbJhowA4KO5AXkEVc/nNukcSKYvw3LGEiIMcnLm 0bacjrx14FaXuxqB8pyM0n1KCNEfhYPBkHyER3P8sO/4e7pD869IkY8ZyzT5szcoOTep 5jSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr8+4SUsRcl1Didwq+zdeOlPbMArcdX9K+CGzBVg8jrEuPSFpMh /hG6VWh51UNsosJyTO2tQod/SA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvsrrnyubkoIRIiOl73MBcjF0zDuUkzvwjCmhdDcM21TH3Nrtmj7W8mmeJ6UUuTMkXw3WvJfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8188:0:b0:27f:cc2b:7048 with SMTP id e8-20020a2e8188000000b0027fcc2b7048mr1291129ljg.13.1672239830263; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 07:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (088156142067.dynamic-2-waw-k-3-2-0.vectranet.pl. [88.156.142.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x10-20020a2e880a000000b002771057e0e5sm1948121ljh.76.2022.12.28.07.03.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Dec 2022 07:03:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 16:03:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: ti: Add new compatible for AM62 SoC family Content-Language: en-US To: Devarsh Thakkar , andersson@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, s-anna@ti.com Cc: hnagalla@ti.com, praneeth@ti.com, nm@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com, a-bhatia1@ti.com, j-luthra@ti.com References: <20221227145216.1524-1-devarsht@ti.com> <20221227145216.1524-2-devarsht@ti.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20221227145216.1524-2-devarsht@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/12/2022 15:52, Devarsh Thakkar wrote: > AM62 family of devices don't have a R5F cluster, instead > they have single core DM R5F. > Add new compatible string ti,am62-r5fss to support this scenario. > > When this new compatible is used don't allow cluster-mode > property usage in device-tree as this implies that there > is no R5F cluster available and only single R5F core > is present. > > Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar > --- > V2: Avoid acronyms, use "Device Manager" instead of "DM" > V3: > - Use separate if block for each compatible for ti,cluster-mode property > - Rearrange compatibles as per alphabatical order > V4: Place each enum in separate line in allOf > V5: No change (fixing typo in email address) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof