From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A480C43387 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0295B2084C for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b="TJfjIkH8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725805AbfAKV2w (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:28:52 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-f196.google.com ([209.85.219.196]:40627 "EHLO mail-yb1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725730AbfAKV2v (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:28:51 -0500 Received: by mail-yb1-f196.google.com with SMTP id i6so2782719ybo.7 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:28:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=PW+iFYKiZXJTOX93yIrYnuspfcNtG9ovkhcDVYkM07w=; b=TJfjIkH8TO3Qk/oz9gnIatmU8kPP/dYNSE8g6nonTzrgxX8fkbQ+jPI+niDmjYDrXe dmGr9VE0FzgOkHkEKbM5G3srY/JC1PuUQ1GNLlW6NvWZNCGiJ+BD3vtSfO1JwYC1cS+4 V/x7zmxDGJH7im4xAM8VSxIzabErqi9+yvUMg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=PW+iFYKiZXJTOX93yIrYnuspfcNtG9ovkhcDVYkM07w=; b=odaGPFzKV5yX62MmF7PvjriFrV/DkhIwJMrGLzdEzcf3EFYNxdWU38yi5Aw1qLEXQN TauUoonP2STXkqZNOeiMWheyvi0Nx0N25/w6JtRkS7d856xYjInZo9+S6dbUd27UTfvx BwMPsadGeY3IuQeobeAPFaGOFF/2EALEsu0cR40c14wGhxqHn3rNwBIHdCw74ZRjToww gyo0R0uGY5vHKXjgrr8UvWJ6+Mq/qXsv9C850Pavdfd1WJgyDWBeqHVj59/4cp2vpGxF SGvBODEyespI9jShLzcUC6qS3wTId/daPJKTBiQF8Fl6ytzBH/iwZd2wzqBGuD6LHgZO pKZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeMbuJfAd3I7zsA/8bxyJk4i3NAs/edUO3Z8o4IHETW36f2JmMA XPRkXT6vC7ys91XUl4MtQiCt9DUVPOCx2zy9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6iQIhBjir5hLQlVAfbqJ7QYklFND9ZiZB4pJlTYGzS5alwjTXx+lmKirBAk8vFXD4vvT5wFA== X-Received: by 2002:a25:ad28:: with SMTP id y40mr8794374ybi.338.1547242130687; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:28:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.136.13.65] ([192.19.228.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m126sm28904083ywd.39.2019.01.11.13.28.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:28:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: kona: Add new compatible for new version pwm-kona To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=c3=b6nig?= , Sheetal Tigadoli Cc: Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Florian Fainelli , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Praveen Kumar B References: <1547184076-20521-1-git-send-email-sheetal.tigadoli@broadcom.com> <1547184076-20521-2-git-send-email-sheetal.tigadoli@broadcom.com> <20190111204801.2ytdeblcai7lg3on@pengutronix.de> From: Scott Branden Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:28:45 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190111204801.2ytdeblcai7lg3on@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Uwe On 2019-01-11 12:48 p.m., Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:51:14AM +0530, Sheetal Tigadoli wrote: >> From: Praveen Kumar B >> >> Add new compatible string for new version of pwm-kona >> >> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar B >> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui >> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden >> Signed-off-by: Sheetal Tigadoli >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt >> index 8eae9fe..d37f697 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/brcm,kona-pwm.txt >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Broadcom Kona PWM controller device tree bindings >> This controller has 6 channels. >> >> Required Properties : >> -- compatible: should contain "brcm,kona-pwm" >> +- compatible: should contain "brcm,kona-pwm" or "brcm,kona-pwm-v2" > Is v2 used on a newer generation of kona SoCs? On i.MX these variants > are usually named after the first SoC that came with the new variant. Is > this sensible here, too? It doesn't make as much sense here as different revs of the IP block are picked up based on various decisions. A new SoC could decide to use an old version. > > Best regards > Uwe >