From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6C1C4708E for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 02:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC296135F for ; Sat, 29 May 2021 02:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229636AbhE2CmG (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2021 22:42:06 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:2341 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229543AbhE2CmF (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2021 22:42:05 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FsQdz1txxz19Vr7; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:35:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:40:28 +0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.177.72) by dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 29 May 2021 10:40:27 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tracing: fix spelling mistakes To: Steven Rostedt CC: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel References: <20210525062047.8951-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20210525062047.8951-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20210528211314.5dba632a@oasis.local.home> <93006372-8482-84af-52c0-1d6e7f66e187@huawei.com> <20210528221113.4f66aaea@oasis.local.home> From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 10:40:27 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210528221113.4f66aaea@oasis.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.72] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/5/29 10:11, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sat, 29 May 2021 10:01:31 +0800 > "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" wrote: > >> On 2021/5/29 9:13, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> On Tue, 25 May 2021 14:20:47 +0800 >>> Zhen Lei wrote: >>> >>>> Fix some spelling mistakes in comments: >>>> wont ==> won't >>> >>> I prefer not to fix that spelling. I sometimes purposely leave off >>> single quotes. It's no that big of a deal, and doesn't deserve the >>> churn. >> >> Yes, all people can get it right by their wits. "Wont" doesn't affect >> their reading speed. But most people might think it's best to add the >> missing single quote. >> >> The minority obeys the majority? > > I really don't care. In my opinion, it's unnecessary churn, that just > adds noise to the git logs. git grep -wn wont | wc -l 83 OK, I just did a search for "wont", and there are currently 83 places in use. Language is not mathematics, there is no absolute right or wrong. If a lot of people are using it incorrectly or specifically, then the new one is also right. Wow, should I send v2 to remove "wont ==> won't"? > > -- Steve > > . >