mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
	"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au" <andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au>,
	"rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"pasha.tatashin@soleen.com" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	"kernel-team@meta.com" <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"david@kernel.org" <david@kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
	"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"azpijr@gmail.com" <azpijr@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"tglx@kernel.org" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"rmclure@linux.ibm.com" <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Define the zapped-entry checks only with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 16:53:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f20b6d4f4e9368885e187e208453f21a9b0a2140.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102144001.342837-1-kas@kernel.org>

On Mon, 2026-11-02 at 14:39 +0000, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> Zapping a range calls arch_check_zapped_pte() for every batch of PTEs,
> which is every page for small folios, and arch_check_zapped_pmd() or
> arch_check_zapped_pud() for every huge leaf. On x86 these are out-of-line
> functions whose only content is a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(), so without
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM they are empty, but the call remains. With the SRSO "Safe
> RET" mitigation the return of every such call mispredicts.
> 
> Declare and define the checks only with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. Otherwise the
> empty inlines from <linux/pgtable.h> apply, as on every other
> architecture. They cannot be inlines in <asm/pgtable.h>: VM_SHADOW_STACK
> is defined in <linux/mm.h> after it includes <linux/pgtable.h>.
> 
> In a KVM guest on Zen 4 with Safe RET, zapping 4K pages takes one branch
> miss per page fewer. MADV_DONTNEED of 1 GiB gets 6% faster on anonymous
> memory and 8% on shmem, munmap() 5%. THP is unchanged.

I guess this is the impact of this fix on Safe RET machines, but it's a little
ambiguous. With the assumption that a mitigation didn't result in the
performance improvement I can parse it.

Do you happen to know if this performance impact is relevant at all in the non
Safe RET case?

> 
> Fixes: e5136e876581 ("mm: Warn on shadow stack memory in wrong vma")
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) <kas@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++
>  arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c          | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 000fc6c1ca37..9b03a316fb75 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -1666,6 +1666,7 @@ static inline bool arch_has_pfn_modify_check(void)
>  	return boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>  #define arch_check_zapped_pte arch_check_zapped_pte
>  void arch_check_zapped_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t pte);
>  
> @@ -1674,6 +1675,7 @@ void arch_check_zapped_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pmd_t pmd);
>  
>  #define arch_check_zapped_pud arch_check_zapped_pud
>  void arch_check_zapped_pud(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pud_t pud);
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV
>  #define arch_has_hw_nonleaf_pmd_young arch_has_hw_nonleaf_pmd_young
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> index 4a105f283cfb..3352bc6904f3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -798,6 +798,7 @@ pmd_t pmd_mkwrite(pmd_t pmd, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  	return pmd_clear_saveddirty(pmd);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>  void arch_check_zapped_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	/*
> @@ -823,3 +824,4 @@ void arch_check_zapped_pud(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pud_t pud)
>  	/* See note in arch_check_zapped_pte() */
>  	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK) &&
> pud_shstk(pud));

I guess all of these don't need to be the "VM_WARN_" varieties if they are
compiled out in the other case.

>  }
> +#endif


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-02 14:39 Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-11-02 16:09 ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-02 16:53 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2026-11-02 17:32   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-11-02 19:07     ` Edgecombe, Rick P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f20b6d4f4e9368885e187e208453f21a9b0a2140.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au \
    --cc=azpijr@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®