From: "Leonidas ." <leonidas137@gmail.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GFP_NOWAIT and GFP_NOMEMALLOC
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:46:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f22d86810909290516l4cdda2bav3588cc5f7d1f2f65@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090929135925.50ac88bf@infradead.org>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:55:24 +0530
> "Leonidas ." <leonidas137@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I am new here, I have googled/binged enough before posting this
>> message, in case of redundancy please point me to appropriate
>> links/resources etc.
>>
>> I want to kmalloc memory while holding spinlocks in process context,
>> here I can't use GFP_KERNEL flag since it can sleep. Using GFP_ATOMIC
>> guarantees that allocation will succeed by allocating from emergency
>> pools if needed. But I dont think, I need to use emergency pool and I
>> want to limit my memory consumption to ZONE_NORMAL without sleeping,
>> my module is ready to handle the allocation failure if any.
>
> GFP_NOWAIT is what you want.
>
> can you give us a pointer to what your module is about? Maybe there's
> better solutions...
>
>
> --
> Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
> visit http://www.lesswatts.org
>
The module is going to be a profiling module and the user module which
is under profiling
will call the apis which I am exporting. My apis will collect certain
data from point
it is called and populate internal data strcuctures. My apis can be
called from process
context as well as interrupt context hence I am using spinlocks as
locking mechanism.
The amount of memory I am allocating each time my api is called around
100 bytes,
and in worst case I might end up allocating tens of thousands of
objects of almost same
size. I am aware that in such a scenario I should be using some kind
of memory pool
mechanism and preallocate my buffers to avoid frequent
allocations/deallocations.
But frankly, I am not very familiar with Linux kernel apis yet hence
have resorted to
using a tree data structure for the first cut where I allocate memory as needed
depending on the context I am executing in. To optimize a bit, I do
not free my memory
till some threshold is reached.
Some questions here:
1. GFP_NOWAIT as in kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | GFPNOWAIT)?
or
kmalloc(size, GFP_NOWAIT), I know this one is a dumb one.
2. Any reference for the mempool kind of implementation mentioned above?
3. Any other pointers about design, references etc would be helpful.
-Leo.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 11:25 Leonidas .
2009-09-29 11:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-29 12:16 ` Leonidas . [this message]
2009-09-29 12:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-29 12:43 ` Leonidas .
2009-10-04 18:56 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f22d86810909290516l4cdda2bav3588cc5f7d1f2f65@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leonidas137@gmail.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®