mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Verify DA node btree hash order
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 01:08:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f265594f-6676-459e-9900-ae10f2efa0d5@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414221559.GC25675@frogsfrogsfrogs>


On 15/4/25 01:15, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 08:03:57PM +0000, Charalampos Mitrodimas wrote:
>> The xfs_da3_node_verify() function checks the integrity of directory
>> and attribute B-tree node blocks. However, it was missing a check to
>> ensure that the hash values of the btree entries within the node are
>> strictly increasing, as required by the B-tree structure.
>>
>> Add a loop to iterate through the btree entries and verify that each
>> entry's hash value is greater than the previous one. If an
>> out-of-order hash value is detected, return failure to indicate
>> corruption.
>>
>> This addresses the "XXX: hash order check?" comment and improves
>> corruption detection for DA node blocks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
>> ---
>>   fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
>> index 17d9e6154f1978ce5a5cb82176eea4d6b9cd768d..6c748911e54619c3ceae9b81f55cf61da6735f01 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
>> @@ -247,7 +247,16 @@ xfs_da3_node_verify(
>>   	    ichdr.count > mp->m_attr_geo->node_ents)
>>   		return __this_address;
>>   
>> -	/* XXX: hash order check? */
>> +	/* Check hash order */
>> +	uint32_t prev_hash = be32_to_cpu(ichdr.btree[0].hashval);
>> +
>> +	for (int i = 1; i < ichdr.count; i++) {
>> +		uint32_t curr_hash = be32_to_cpu(ichdr.btree[i].hashval);
>> +
>> +		if (curr_hash <= prev_hash)
> Does XFS support a directory with two names that hash to the same value?


Hi Darrick,

I believe so, yes. These are handled at the leaf level by comparing the
actual names. This adds a check which ensures the intermediate node's
internal B-tree entries are strictly ordered by hash.

C. Mitrodimas

>
> --D
>
>> +			return __this_address;
>> +		prev_hash = curr_hash;
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: ecd5d67ad602c2c12e8709762717112ef0958767
>> change-id: 20250412-xfs-hash-check-be7397881a2c
>>
>> Best regards,
>> -- 
>> Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-15  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6Fo_nCBU7RijxC1Kg6qD573hCAQBTcddQlb7i0E9C7tbpPIycSQ8Vt3BeW-1DqdayPO9EzyJLyNgxpH6rfts4g==@protonmail.internalid>
2025-04-12 20:03 ` Charalampos Mitrodimas
2025-04-14 22:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15  1:08     ` Charalampos Mitrodimas [this message]
2025-04-30  9:23   ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-05-01 14:12     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-01 18:54       ` Charalampos Mitrodimas
2025-05-03 21:12       ` Charalampos Mitrodimas
2025-05-05  7:10       ` Carlos Maiolino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f265594f-6676-459e-9900-ae10f2efa0d5@posteo.net \
    --to=charmitro@posteo.net \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®