From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Christophe Leroy' <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] /dev/zero: also implement ->read
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 20:52:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2e9c57db2b548949e6bd570a6dc3c5d@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c353864-76a9-90bf-fa2f-f7a8231b5487@csgroup.eu>
From: Christophe Leroy
> Sent: 06 September 2020 19:36
> Hi,
>
> Le 06/09/2020 à 20:21, Pavel Machek a écrit :
> > Hi!
> >
> >>>> Christophe reported a major speedup due to avoiding the iov_iter
> >>>> overhead, so just add this trivial function. Note that /dev/zero
> >>>> already implements both an iter and non-iter writes so this just
> >>>> makes it more symmetric.
> >>>>
> >>>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >>>
> >>> Tested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> >>
> >> Any idea what has happened to make the 'iter' version so bad?
> >
> > Exactly. Also it would be nice to note how the speedup was measured
> > and what the speedup is.
> >
>
> Was measured on an 8xx powerpc running at 132MHz with:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null count=1M
>
> With the patch, dd displays a throughput of 113.5MB/s
> Without the patch it is 99.9MB/s
That in itself isn't a problem.
What was the throughput before any of these patches?
I just remember another thread about the same test running
a lot slower after one of the related changes.
While this speeds up read /dev/zero (which is uncommon)
if this is needed to get near the old performance then
the changes to the 'iter' code will affect real workloads.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-06 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-03 15:59 Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-03 16:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-03 21:35 ` David Laight
2020-09-06 18:21 ` Pavel Machek
2020-09-06 18:35 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-06 18:38 ` Pavel Machek
2020-09-06 18:47 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-06 20:09 ` gregkh
2020-09-06 20:52 ` David Laight [this message]
2020-09-07 4:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-07 8:18 ` David Laight
2020-09-03 17:51 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-03 18:02 ` Greg KH
2020-09-06 22:34 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-09-07 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-07 6:50 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-09-07 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2e9c57db2b548949e6bd570a6dc3c5d@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®