Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: google: Add Google Tensor G5 USB PHY

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 05/12/2025 19:47, Roy Luo wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 9:13 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/12/2025 04:54, Roy Luo wrote:
>>> Document the device tree bindings for the USB PHY interfaces integrated
>>> with the DWC3 controller on Google Tensor SoCs, starting with G5
>>> generation (Laguna). The USB PHY on Tensor G5 includes two integrated
>>> Synopsys PHY IPs: the eUSB 2.0 PHY IP and the USB 3.2/DisplayPort combo
>>> PHY IP.
>>>
>>> Due to a complete architectural overhaul in the Google Tensor G5, the
>>> existing Samsung/Exynos USB PHY binding for older generations of Google
>>> silicons such as gs101 are no longer compatible, necessitating this new
>>> device tree binding.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roy Luo <royluo@google.com>
>>
>> Why intentionally dropping the tag? How are you handling this patchset?
>> Rewrite every time from scratch?
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> I dropped the tag because a new file is being modified in this version,
> Although it's just MAINTAINER file but I thought you might also want
> to take a look. I wasn't sure if modifying a new file qualifies as
> "substantial" so I erred on the side of caution. I should've called it
> out specifically in the change log. Sorry for the inconvenience.

1. so just squeeze that change into second patch and no need to ask for
re-review
2. You did not read my complain fully, look:

> 
> Regards,
> Roy Luo
> 
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
>> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
>> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
>> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
>> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
>> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
>> tags received on the version they apply.
>>
>> Please read:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Where did you address this? You dropped the tag silently.


Best regards,
Krzysztof