From: lyude@redhat.com
To: moonafterrain@outlook.com, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
Mary Guillemard <mary@mary.zone>,
Mohamed Ahmed <mohamedahmedegypt2001@gmail.com>,
James Jones <jajones@nvidia.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/uvmm: reject replace across page sizes
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:23:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3576e4263b19d183e343eac9c56d4fc8385b431.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9041ce7f5d6ae30213aa1ab895a4225fb33246ed.camel@redhat.com>
Wait-nope, hold on. Was double checking this to make sure there wasn't
anything I missed, and the sashiko comment I'm seeing looks quite
legitimate. Mind dropping my R-b and addressing that if it looks
legitimate?
On Fri, 2026-10-09 at 18:19 -0400, lyude@redhat.com wrote:
> Looks good to me, will push to drm-misc-fixes in a moment.
>
> On Fri, 2026-10-09 at 16:52 +0800, Junrui Luo via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
> >
> > A new mapping takes over the page tables of the mappings it
> > replaces.
> > nouveau_uvmm_sm_prepare() only acquires page tables for the range
> > no
> > existing mapping covers, and the map path frees the replaced
> > mappings
> > without putting their references. That is only valid while all of
> > them
> > use the same page size, which select_page_shift() no longer
> > guarantees.
> >
> > Rebinding a GART BO over a 2MiB VRAM BO therefore leaves the new
> > mapping
> > owning page tables built for a different page size, and it then
> > maps
> > at a
> > size that was never referenced over that range. Since raw map does
> > not
> > allocate, nvkm_vmm_iter() can walk down to a NULL leaf and
> > dereference
> > it. The remainders of a split have the same problem:
> > op_map_prepare()
> > recomputes a page size with select_page_shift() while the remainder
> > keeps
> > the parent's page tables, so a parent that was itself downgraded
> > can
> > leave
> > a remainder that re-aligns to a larger size. This happens on the
> > unmap
> > path too.
> >
> > Reject the bind, and make split remainders inherit the page size of
> > the
> > mapping they are split from.
> >
> > Fixes: c488a94e7e14 ("drm/nouveau/uvmm: Allow larger pages")
> > Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
> > Assisted-by: LLM
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Drop patch 1, which has been merged.
> > - Use the abbreviated conditional operator for page_shift (Lyude
> > Paul).
> > - Compare against remap_args.page_shift (Lyude Paul).
> > - Use Assisted-by: LLM (Balbir Singh).
> > - Add Lyude's Reviewed-by.
> > - Link to v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260817-nouveau-fixes-v1-0-f518d0c735f3@outlook.com
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 32
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > index f5e4756b4de4..aa5b93808f41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
> > @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ struct uvmm_map_args {
> > u64 addr;
> > u64 range;
> > u8 kind;
> > + /* Page size to give the new mapping, or 0 to derive it
> > from
> > the op. */
> > + u8 page_shift;
> > };
> >
> > static int
> > @@ -655,7 +657,7 @@ op_map_prepare(struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm,
> >
> > uvma->region = args->region;
> > uvma->kind = args->kind;
> > - uvma->page_shift = select_page_shift(uvmm, op);
> > + uvma->page_shift = args->page_shift ?:
> > select_page_shift(uvmm, op);
> >
> > drm_gpuva_map(&uvmm->base, &uvma->va, op);
> >
> > @@ -684,8 +686,20 @@ nouveau_uvmm_sm_prepare(struct nouveau_uvmm
> > *uvmm,
> > struct drm_gpuva_op *op;
> > u64 vmm_get_start = args ? args->addr : 0;
> > u64 vmm_get_end = args ? args->addr + args->range : 0;
> > + u8 map_page_shift = 0;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + /* A new mapping takes over the page tables of the
> > mappings
> > it replaces,
> > + * so every one of them has to be using its page size. The
> > new mapping
> > + * is the last op drm_gpuvm_sm_map_ops_create() emits.
> > + */
> > + if (args) {
> > + struct drm_gpuva_op *last =
> > drm_gpuva_last_op(ops);
> > +
> > + if (last->op == DRM_GPUVA_OP_MAP)
> > + map_page_shift = select_page_shift(uvmm,
> > &last->map);
> > + }
> > +
> > drm_gpuva_for_each_op(op, ops) {
> > switch (op->op) {
> > case DRM_GPUVA_OP_MAP: {
> > @@ -713,11 +727,22 @@ nouveau_uvmm_sm_prepare(struct nouveau_uvmm
> > *uvmm,
> > struct uvmm_map_args remap_args = {
> > .kind = uvma_from_va(va)->kind,
> > .region = uvma_from_va(va)-
> > >region,
> > + /* The remainders of the split
> > keep
> > the page
> > + * tables of the mapping they are
> > split from,
> > + * so they must keep its page size
> > too.
> > + */
> > + .page_shift = uvma_from_va(va)-
> > > page_shift,
> > };
> > u64 ustart = va->va.addr;
> > u64 urange = va->va.range;
> > u64 uend = ustart + urange;
> >
> > + if (map_page_shift &&
> > + remap_args.page_shift !=
> > map_page_shift)
> > {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto unwind;
> > + }
> > +
> > op_unmap_prepare(r->unmap);
> >
> > if (r->prev) {
> > @@ -756,6 +781,11 @@ nouveau_uvmm_sm_prepare(struct nouveau_uvmm
> > *uvmm,
> > u64 uend = ustart + urange;
> > u8 page_shift = uvma_from_va(va)-
> > > page_shift;
> >
> > + if (map_page_shift && page_shift !=
> > map_page_shift) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto unwind;
> > + }
> > +
> > op_unmap_prepare(u);
> >
> > if (!args)
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: f5bbbfec59b4e2fb7520a91de3df8a6174325d6a
> > change-id: 20260817-nouveau-fixes-23877845c3ab
> >
> > Best regards,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 8:52 Junrui Luo via B4 Relay
2026-10-09 22:19 ` lyude
2026-10-09 22:23 ` lyude [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3576e4263b19d183e343eac9c56d4fc8385b431.camel@redhat.com \
--to=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=danisjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jajones@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mary@mary.zone \
--cc=mohamedahmedegypt2001@gmail.com \
--cc=moonafterrain@outlook.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®