From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: don't report PAT on CPUs that don't support it
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:28:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f359fc2e-0ef3-3173-5e78-36bcb5a04316@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1704181501450.26399@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On 04/18/17 12:07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> In the file arch/x86/mm/pat.c, there's a variable __pat_enabled. The
> variable is set to 1 by default and the function pat_init() sets
> __pat_enabled to 0 if the CPU doesn't support PAT.
>
> However, on AMD K6-3 CPU, the processor initialization code never calls
> pat_init() and so __pat_enabled stays 1 and the function pat_enabled()
> returns true, even though the K6-3 CPU doesn't support PAT.
>
> The result of this bug is that this warning is produced when attemting to
> start the Xserver and the Xserver doesn't start (fork() returns ENOMEM).
> Another symptom of this bug is that the framebuffer driver doesn't set the
> K6-3 MTRR registers.
>
> This patch changes pat_enabled() so that it returns true only if pat
> initialization was actually done.
>
> Also, I changed boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) to
> this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) in pat_ap_init, so that we check the PAT
> feature on the processor that is being initialized.
>
I'm thinking it would be better to replace __pat_enabled with
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) and disable the feature bit if the user
has disabled it on the command line, just as we do with other features.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 19:07 Mikulas Patocka
2017-04-18 19:28 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2017-04-18 20:47 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-05-14 22:07 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-05-16 13:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-05-16 15:49 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-05-18 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-05-24 10:21 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Fix Xorg regression on CPUs that don't support PAT tip-bot for Mikulas Patocka
2017-05-28 18:18 ` Bernhard Held
2017-05-28 18:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-29 22:50 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-05-30 17:14 ` Dominik Brodowski
2017-05-30 17:59 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-05-30 18:47 ` Dominik Brodowski
2017-05-30 19:30 ` Bernhard Held
2017-05-31 9:39 ` Junichi Nomura
2017-06-06 22:49 ` [PATCH v2] X86: don't report PAT on CPUs that don't support it Mikulas Patocka
2017-06-06 22:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-06 23:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-06-13 15:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-14 20:24 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-06-07 19:54 ` Bernhard Held
2017-07-03 5:05 ` Mikulas Patocka
2017-07-04 13:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 13:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-07-04 23:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Mikulas Patocka
2017-07-05 7:03 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/pat: Don't " tip-bot for Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f359fc2e-0ef3-3173-5e78-36bcb5a04316@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®