From: Mikhail Kalashnikov <iuncuim@gmail.com>
To: wens@kernel.org
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>,
Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] thermal/drivers/sun8i: Add support for A523 THS0/1 controllers
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 16:57:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3b6c6f4-2be9-4eab-b4ba-970cae865753@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v67Z0g37Wyvd=xaMGkLHt09qqqJnufsxKdG0nO_C2QmOGA@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/21/26 23:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2026 at 1:15 AM Mikhail Kalashnikov <iuncuim@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The A523 processor has two temperature controllers, THS0 and THS1.
>> THS0 has only one temperature sensor, which is located in the DRAM
>> controller. THS1 does have 3 sensors:
>> ths1_0 - "big" cores
>> ths1_1 - "little" cores
>> ths1_2 - gpu
>>
>> The datasheet mentions a fourth sensor in the NPU, but lacks any registers
>> for operation other than calibration registers. The vendor code reads the
>> value from ths1_2, but uses separate calibration data, so we get two
>> different values from real one.
>
> Are you sure? The calibration data is written to the sensor register.
>
> The BSP simply reads the sensor data from the GPU sensor, and passes it
> off as the value for the NPU sensor. No extra calculation involving the
> calibration data is done.
>
Yes, I think you're right. And as Juan pointed out, my current
implementation doesn't match the BSP, since:
#define SUN55IW3_GPU_SENSOR_ID (2)
#define SUN55IW3_NPU_SENSOR_ID (3)
...
/* use NPU sensor data instead of GPU */
if (id == SUN55IW3_GPU_SENSOR_ID) {
id = SUN55IW3_NPU_SENSOR_ID;
...
}
In other words, in the BSP driver, the NPU sensor is used for the GPU.
However, based on the A523 user manual—which describes registers for
only three sensors, I had argued the opposite. The user manual for the
T527 includes a description of a fourth sensor.
Thus, it seems that all four sensors are working, but the purpose of
this workaround in the BSP remains unclear to me.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Kalashnikov <iuncuim@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 133 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
>> index 3bdd62aa8..f48ed9eae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/sun8i_thermal.c
>> @@ -59,6 +59,12 @@
>> #define SUN50I_H6_THS_PC_TEMP_PERIOD(x) ((GENMASK(19, 0) & (x)) << 12)
>> #define SUN50I_H6_THS_DATA_IRQ_STS(x) BIT(x)
>>
>> +#define SUN55I_A523_DELIMITER 0x7c8
>> +#define SUN55I_A523_OFFSET_ABOVE 2736
>> +#define SUN55I_A523_OFFSET_BELOW 2825
>> +#define SUN55I_A523_SCALE_ABOVE 74
>> +#define SUN55I_A523_SCALE_BELOW 65
>> +
>> struct tsensor {
>> struct ths_device *tmdev;
>> struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
>> @@ -114,6 +120,15 @@ static int sun50i_h5_calc_temp(struct ths_device *tmdev,
>> return -1590 * reg / 10 + 276000;
>> }
>>
>> +static int sun55i_a523_calc_temp(struct ths_device *tmdev,
>> + int id, int reg)
>> +{
>> + if (reg >= SUN55I_A523_DELIMITER)
>> + return SUN55I_A523_SCALE_ABOVE * (SUN55I_A523_OFFSET_ABOVE - reg);
>> + else
>> + return SUN55I_A523_SCALE_BELOW * (SUN55I_A523_OFFSET_BELOW - reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int sun8i_ths_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
>> {
>> struct tsensor *s = thermal_zone_device_priv(tz);
>> @@ -299,6 +314,97 @@ static int sun50i_h6_ths_calibrate(struct ths_device *tmdev,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * The A523 nvmem calibration values. The ths1_3 is not used as it
>> + * doesn't have its own sensor and doesn't have any internal switch.
>> + * Instead, the value from the ths1_2 sensor is used, which gives the
>> + * illusion of an independent sensor for NPU and GPU when using
>> + * different calibration values.
>> + *
>> + * efuse layout 0x38-0x3F (caldata[0..3]):
>> + * caldata[0] caldata[1] caldata[2] caldata[3]
>> + * 0 16 24 32 36 48 60 64
>> + * +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
>> + * | | | temp | ths1_0 | ths1_1 | +
>> + * +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
>> + *
>> + * efuse layout 0x44-0x4B (caldata[4..7]):
>> + * caldata[4] caldata[5] caldata[6] caldata[7]
>> + * 0 12 16 24 32 36 48 64
>> + * +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
>> + * | ths1_2 | ths1_3 | ths0 | | +
>> + * +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
>> + */
>> +static int sun55i_a523_ths_calibrate(struct ths_device *tmdev,
>> + u16 *caldata, int callen)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = tmdev->dev;
>> + int i, ft_temp;
>> +
>> + if (!caldata[0])
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + ft_temp = (((caldata[2] << 8) | (caldata[1] >> 8)) & FT_TEMP_MASK) * 100;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < tmdev->chip->sensor_num; i++) {
>> + int sensor_reg, sensor_temp, cdata, offset;
>> + /*
>> + * Chips ths0 and ths1 have common parameters for value
>> + * calibration. To separate them we can use the number of
>> + * temperature sensors on each chip.
>> + * For ths0 this value is 1.
>> + */
>> + if (tmdev->chip->sensor_num == 1) {
>> + sensor_reg = ((caldata[5] >> 8) | (caldata[6] << 8)) & TEMP_CALIB_MASK;
>> + } else {
>> + switch (i) {
>> + case 0:
>> + sensor_reg = (caldata[2] >> 4) & TEMP_CALIB_MASK;
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + sensor_reg = caldata[3] & TEMP_CALIB_MASK;
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + sensor_reg = caldata[4] & TEMP_CALIB_MASK;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + sensor_reg = 0;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + sensor_temp = tmdev->chip->calc_temp(tmdev, i, sensor_reg);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Calibration data is CALIBRATE_DEFAULT - (calculated
>> + * temperature from sensor reading at factory temperature
>> + * minus actual factory temperature) * X (scale from
>> + * temperature to register values)
>> + */
>> + cdata = CALIBRATE_DEFAULT -
>> + ((sensor_temp - ft_temp) / SUN55I_A523_SCALE_ABOVE);
>
> The BSP version works out to:
>
> cdata = CALIBRATE_DEFAULT -
> (sensor_temp - ft_temp - 5000) / SU55I_A523_SCALE_BELOW
>
> Any particular reason why it's different?
In the early versions, I didn't use 'define' for constants, but later
added them based on the logic of the value read from the register: a
value below the threshold is 'BELOW', and a value above is 'ABOVE'. The
BSP driver uses a name for the temperature, but the temperature
decreases as the value read from the register increases; therefore, the
formula uses SCALE constants with different names but identical values.
In the next version, I’ll align them with the BSP values and add a
comment explaining that the constants refer to the final temperature
value, not the value read from the register.
Regarding SUN55IW3_CAL_COM 5000 — when I first looked at the driver
code, it seemed to me that this was the value intended for ft_deviation,
but now that I’ve double-checked, the version of the calibration formula
with SUN55IW3_CAL_COM and without ft_deviation gives the same result as
the version without SUN55IW3_CAL_COM but with ft_deviation=5000.
But if you'd rather I match BSP literally (5000 in the calibration
numerator, ft_deviation = 0), I can do that instead.
>
>> + if (cdata & ~TEMP_CALIB_MASK) {
>> + /*
>> + * Calibration value more than 12-bit, but calibration
>> + * register is 12-bit. In this case, ths hardware can
>> + * still work without calibration, although the data
>> + * won't be so accurate.
>> + */
>> + dev_warn(dev, "sensor%d is not calibrated.\n", i);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + offset = (i % 2) * 16;
>> + regmap_update_bits(tmdev->regmap,
>> + SUN50I_H6_THS_TEMP_CALIB + (i / 2 * 4),
>> + TEMP_CALIB_MASK << offset,
>> + cdata << offset);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int sun8i_ths_calibrate(struct ths_device *tmdev)
>> {
>> struct nvmem_cell *calcell = NULL;
>> @@ -717,6 +823,31 @@ static const struct ths_thermal_chip sun50i_h616_ths = {
>> .calc_temp = sun8i_ths_calc_temp,
>> };
>>
>> +/* The A523 has a shared reset line for both chips */
>> +static const struct ths_thermal_chip sun55i_a523_ths0 = {
>> + .sensor_num = 1,
>> + .has_bus_clk_reset = true,
>> + .has_mod_clk = true,
>> + .ft_deviation = 5000,
>
> In the BSP this is 0.
>
>> + .temp_data_base = SUN50I_H6_THS_TEMP_DATA,
>> + .calibrate = sun55i_a523_ths_calibrate,
>> + .init = sun50i_h6_thermal_init,
>> + .irq_ack = sun50i_h6_irq_ack,
>> + .calc_temp = sun55i_a523_calc_temp,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct ths_thermal_chip sun55i_a523_ths1 = {
>> + .sensor_num = 3,
>> + .has_bus_clk_reset = true,
>> + .has_mod_clk = true,
>> + .ft_deviation = 5000,
>
> In the BSP this is 0.
>
>
> ChenYu
>
>> + .temp_data_base = SUN50I_H6_THS_TEMP_DATA,
>> + .calibrate = sun55i_a523_ths_calibrate,
>> + .init = sun50i_h6_thermal_init,
>> + .irq_ack = sun50i_h6_irq_ack,
>> + .calc_temp = sun55i_a523_calc_temp,
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct of_device_id of_ths_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths", .data = &sun8i_a83t_ths },
>> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-ths", .data = &sun8i_h3_ths },
>> @@ -727,6 +858,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_ths_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-ths", .data = &sun50i_h6_ths },
>> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-ths", .data = &sun20i_d1_ths },
>> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616-ths", .data = &sun50i_h616_ths },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun55i-a523-ths0", .data = &sun55i_a523_ths0 },
>> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun55i-a523-ths1", .data = &sun55i_a523_ths1 },
>> { /* sentinel */ },
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_ths_match);
>> --
>> 2.55.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-04 17:14 [PATCH v5 0/5] Allwinner: A523: add " Mikhail Kalashnikov
2026-07-04 17:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: thermal: sun8i: Add " Mikhail Kalashnikov
2026-07-05 9:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-04 17:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] thermal/drivers/sun8i: replace devm_reset_control_get to devm_reset_control_get_shared_deasserted Mikhail Kalashnikov
2026-07-06 10:35 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-07-04 17:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] thermal/drivers/sun8i: get calibration data from two nvmem cells Mikhail Kalashnikov
2026-07-12 5:21 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-07-04 17:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] thermal/drivers/sun8i: Add support for A523 THS0/1 controllers Mikhail Kalashnikov
2026-07-21 15:23 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-09-06 8:57 ` Mikhail Kalashnikov [this message]
2026-08-10 20:01 ` Juan Manuel López Carrillo
2026-07-04 17:14 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: allwinner: sun55i: add thermal sensors Mikhail Kalashnikov
2026-07-21 13:59 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3b6c6f4-2be9-4eab-b4ba-970cae865753@gmail.com \
--to=iuncuim@gmail.com \
--cc=anarsoul@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=tiny.windzz@gmail.com \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®