From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
David Dai <david.dai@linux.dev>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Aiqun Yu <aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] sched_ext: Generalize the reject DSQ reenqueue path
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 12:45:50 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3ec3ccd48df8f75d6fb944151f0f928@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260816173732.17162-12-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hello, Andrea.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 07:35:09PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> @@ -1807,6 +1806,9 @@ void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> }
> p->scx.dsq = NULL;
>
> + if (dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_REJECT)
> + p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK;
Two things bother me here. scx_dispatch_dequeue() is a DSQ unlink
primitive and managing the reason lifetime doesn't seem to belong in it.
And it leads to the following in scx_reenq_reject():
> list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &rq->scx.reject_dsq.list, scx.dsq_list.node) {
> + u32 reason = p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK;
...
> scx_dispatch_dequeue(rq, p);
> -
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK))
> - p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK;
> - p->scx.flags |= SCX_TASK_REENQ_CAP;
> + p->scx.flags |= reason;
where the drain clears the reason just to immediately put it back.
Can't we keep scx_dispatch_dequeue() oblivious of the reason and instead
clear it explicitly where its lifetime actually ends? ie. Clear directly
in dequeue_task_scx() after the DSQ removal and in the
SCX_DEQ_CORE_SCHED_EXEC path of set_next_task_scx(), and keep the
conditional helper for the reenqueue sites, maybe renamed to
scx_maybe_clear_reenq_reason() as clearing is conditional only there.
Then the drain doesn't need to save and restore anything.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-16 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-16 17:34 [PATCHSET v12 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched: Make proxy execution compatible with sched_ext Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:34 ` [PATCH 01/17] sched/core: Drop mutex locks before proxy rescheduling Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 02/17] sched/core: Dequeue waking proxy donors before reset Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 20:20 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-16 21:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 03/17] sched: Make NOHZ CFS bandwidth checks follow proxy donor Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 04/17] sched/core: Avoid false migration warning for proxy donors Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 05/17] sched: Pass next class to sched_change_begin() Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 06/17] sched: Add helper to block retained proxy donors Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 07/17] sched: Add sched_ext hooks for proxy execution Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 08/17] sched_ext: Block proxy donors across scheduler transitions Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 21:32 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-16 22:06 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 09/17] sched_ext: Fix ops.running/stopping() pairing for proxy-exec donors Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 22:10 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-16 22:21 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 22:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 10/17] sched_ext: Move reject DSQ draining into core Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 11/17] sched_ext: Generalize the reject DSQ reenqueue path Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 22:45 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-08-17 6:29 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 12/17] sched_ext: Handle proxy-exec races in remote DSQ transfers Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 23:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-17 7:15 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-17 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-17 19:32 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-17 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 13/17] sched_ext: Split curr|donor references properly Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 14/17] sched_ext: Delegate proxy donor admission to BPF schedulers Andrea Righi
2026-08-17 3:02 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-17 19:02 ` Andrea Righi
2026-08-17 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 15/17] sched_ext: Add selftest for blocked donor admission Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 16/17] sched_ext: scx_qmap: Add proxy execution support Andrea Righi
2026-08-16 17:35 ` [PATCH 17/17] sched: Allow enabling proxy exec with sched_ext Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3ec3ccd48df8f75d6fb944151f0f928@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®