From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751724AbeEUJed (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 05:34:33 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45608 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751081AbeEUJeb (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 05:34:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] ARM: perf: Allow the use of the PMUv3 driver on 32bit ARM To: Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Vince Weaver , Peter Zijlstra , Stefan Wahren , Eric Anholt , Florian Fainelli References: <20180518143913.26306-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20180518143913.26306-5-marc.zyngier@arm.com> From: Vladimir Murzin Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 10:34:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180518143913.26306-5-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/05/18 15:39, Marc Zyngier wrote: > +static inline int read_pmuver(void) > +{ > + /* PMUVers is not a signed field */ > + u32 dfr0 = read_cpuid_ext(CPUID_EXT_DFR0); > + return (dfr0 >> 24) & 0xf; > +} Should we rule out versions prior v3 here or in __armv8pmu_probe_pmu()? Thanks Vladimir